Use of a latex cover sheath for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) instead of regular disinfection of the echoscope?

Better visualization of cardiac structures is an advantage of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Because of this, the transesophageal approach is an essential window in the assessment of various cardiovascular disorders. Quick consecutive access to this instrument should not be delayed by time‐consuming cleansing procedures of the probe. In this study we used a sterile latex condom in routine TEE examinations as a barrier to contamination of the echoscope, observing practical use and the incidence of perforations. Defects were detected after the procedure by visual inspection and by an airtightness test. Maneuvers or situations associated with an increased likelihood of injury were checked for. In 180 studies a total of 168 patients were consecutively examined; insertion was feasible in all but one case (99.5%). We found 8 of 181 (4.4%) sheaths defective following the procedure. Visual inspection was less sensitive (only 3 of 8) for finding defects than an airtight‐ness test (8 times). Teeth in situ and/or a bite guard are the only sharp edges during insertion and removing the probe; these seem to be the main risk factors in latex perforation. Application of a cover sheath for each examination saves approximately two‐thirds of the time otherwise necessary for a cleansing bath, and easy handling of cover sheaths for TEE make them an alternative to regular disinfection in general. For reasons of safety we recommend checking each used cover sheath after examination for holes so as not to jeopardize the following patient by the possible spread of germs from contaminated probes. Not only visual inspection but also a second method, for example, an airtightness test, is mandatory.

[1]  W. Daniel,et al.  Risk of bacteremia induced by transesophageal echocardiography: analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. , 1992, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  B. A. Nichols,et al.  Transesophageal echocardiography: a sonographer's perspective. , 1991, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  C. Visser,et al.  Safety of Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Multicenter Survey of 10,419 Examinations , 1991, Circulation.

[4]  D. Seifer,et al.  Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  A. Camm,et al.  Transesophageal echocardiography in unsedated outpatients: technique and patient tolerance. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  J. P. Gobetti,et al.  Fluorescein dye evaluation of glove integrity. , 1989, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  Polit Sa A warning about nonsterile rubber gloves. , 1988 .

[8]  M D Abel,et al.  Transesophageal echocardiography: technique, anatomic correlations, implementation, and clinical applications. , 1988, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[9]  N. Skaug Micropunctures of rubber gloves used in oral surgery. , 1976, International journal of oral surgery.

[10]  M. Ritter,et al.  Evaluation of microbial contamination of surgical gloves during actual use. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  K. Bachmann,et al.  Risk of endocarditis in transesophageal echocardiography. , 1993, American heart journal.