Exploring young patients’ perspectives on rehabilitation care: methods and challenges of organizing focus groups for children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND In research on quality of care, the experiences of children and (pre)adolescents are usually assessed by asking their parents. However, these young patients may have preferences of their own, and their experiences do not necessarily concur with those of their parents. Therefore, our research aimed to give young patients an opportunity to speak up for themselves. METHODS Focus group meetings and online focus groups were organized for two age groups (8–11 and 12–15 years) of young patients from two Dutch rehabilitation centres, with the use of a tailored interview technique. The feasibility and applicability of both types of focus groups were assessed. RESULTS For both types of focus groups, recruitment proved a major problem. The focus group meetings with (pre)adolescents proved both feasible and applicable in obtaining information regarding the preferences and experiences towards rehabilitation care. Regarding children's meetings, there were mixed results. The setting suited most of them, but some were more anxious. In general, online focus groups were less successful than expected for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS Possibilities for enhancing the recruitment rate should be considered, as the low participation rates limited generalizability of focus group results. The tailored design proved useful for obtaining relevant input from (pre)adolescents through meetings, but, especially for children, repeated meetings or other locations (e.g. at home) could be considered. This may make participants more at ease. For both age groups, the online focus groups proved far less useful, in terms of participation.

[1]  H. de Graaf,et al.  The Psychological Measurement of Childhood Sexual Development in Western Societies: Methodological Challenges , 2011, Journal of sex research.

[2]  H. Stam,et al.  Sexuality of Young Adults with Cerebral Palsy: Experienced Limitations and Needs , 2010, Sexuality and disability.

[3]  D. Delnoij Measuring patient experiences in Europe: what can we learn from the experiences in the USA and England? , 2009, European journal of public health.

[4]  L. A. House,et al.  Rehabilitation and future participation of youth following spinal cord injury: caregiver perspectives , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[5]  Sandra van Dulmen,et al.  Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[6]  H. Leino‐Kilpi,et al.  The quality of paediatric nursing care: developing the Child Care Quality at Hospital instrument for children. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  J. Fulkerson,et al.  Children's Perceptions of Healthcare Survey , 2009, Nursing administration quarterly.

[8]  R. Hornung,et al.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[9]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Young patients', parents', and survivors' communication preferences in paediatric oncology: Results of online focus groups , 2007, BMC pediatrics.

[11]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Quality of life among adolescents with cerebral palsy: what does the literature tell us? , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  M. Ketelaar,et al.  Validation of the Dutch Giving Youth a Voice Questionnaire (GYV-20): A measure of the client-centredness of rehabilitation services from an adolescent perspective , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  O. Arah,et al.  Made in the USA: the import of American Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Surveys (CAHPS) into the Dutch social insurance system. , 2006, European journal of public health.

[14]  H. Stam,et al.  Social and sexual relationships of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy: a review , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  K. Peterson-Sweeney,et al.  The use of focus groups in pediatric and adolescent research. , 2005, Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners.

[16]  A. Kenny Interaction in cyberspace: an online focus group. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[17]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  Support network of adolescents with chronic disease: adolescents' perspective. , 2004, Nursing & health sciences.

[18]  N. Borgers,et al.  Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Number of Response Options, Negative Wording, and Neutral Mid-Point , 2004 .

[19]  Stuart Myerburg,et al.  Using Internet Discussion Boards as Virtual Focus Groups , 2003, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[20]  Christine Kennedy,et al.  Interactive Data Collection: Benefits of Integrating New Media Into Pediatric Research , 2003, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[21]  E. Williamson,et al.  ‘What did you think about that?’ Researching children's perceptions of participation in a longitudinal genetic epidemiological study , 2003 .

[22]  P. Sloper,et al.  The views of young people with congenital cardiac disease on designing the services for their treatment , 2003, Cardiology in the Young.

[23]  S. Horner,et al.  Using focus group methods with middle school children. , 2000, Research in nursing & health.

[24]  N. Borgers,et al.  Children as Respondents in Survey Research: Cognitive Development and Response Quality 1 , 2000 .

[25]  P. Sloper,et al.  Supporting pupils in mainstream school with an illness or disability: young people's views. , 1999, Child: care, health and development.

[26]  K. Moen,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods , 2015 .

[27]  D. Watson,et al.  Listen to me, too! Lessons from involving children with complex healthcare needs in research about multi-agency services. , 2007, Child: care, health and development.

[28]  P. W. H. M. Francissen,et al.  Wet op de geneeskundige behandelingsovereenkomst (WGBO) , 2004 .

[29]  E. Hennessy,et al.  The use of focus group interviews in pediatric health care research. , 2002, Journal of pediatric psychology.