Cognitive Aspects of Learning in Arbitrary and Non-Arbitrary Contexts: Acquisition of Knowledge from Natural-Language Discourse. Final Report.

This research was concerned with the processes which enable individuals to acquire semantic information from natural-language diScourse, Specific objectIvesvere: (1) to represent semantically the structual meaning of English discourse in terms of a well-defined semantic model, (2) to develop a procedure for using,the semantic representation of a text as a structural model against which a subject's acquired knowledge can be scored, (3) to develop a process model for discourse comprehension, and (4) to investigate hypotheses concerning effects of certain contextual conditions designed to induce inferential operations on text content on knowledge structures acquired from'a text. The task involved obtaining repeated written reconstructions of knowledge acquired from a text. Three experimental contexts were used: (1) an "arbitrary" context, (2) a "problem solving" context, and (2) an incidental memory condition (three problem solving trials followed by incidental recall). Groups one and two wrote four recalls; all groups were tested one week later. Basic data consisted of the relative frequencies of classes of response obtained from a semantic analysis of recall protocols. Results were consistent with a model of comprehension consisting primarily of "generative" rather than purely "interpretive" processes. Sources of individual differences were also studied. Part II contains a detailed development of a semantic, structural model of English discourse; and an associated technique for measuring semantic information acquired from discourSe.

[1]  E. Rothkopf,et al.  Selective facilitative effects of interspersed questions on learning from written materials. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[2]  C. Fillmore Some Problems for Case Grammar , 1971 .

[3]  C. Coombs A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.

[4]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  Towards a semantic description of English , 1969 .

[5]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  11 – Models for Free Recall and Recognition1 , 1970 .

[6]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding , 1972 .

[7]  E. Brunswik Systematic and Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. With Results in Physical and Social Perception , 1949 .

[8]  R M Dawes,et al.  Memory and distortion of meaningful written material. , 1966, British journal of psychology.

[9]  C. Frederiksen,et al.  Abilities, Transfer, and Information Retrieval in Verbal Learning , 1967 .

[10]  N. Cliff,et al.  Adverbs as multipliers. , 1959, Psychological review.

[11]  J. Sachs Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse , 1967 .

[12]  L. V. Jones,et al.  The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. , 1970 .

[13]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  Effects of a Superordinate Context on Learning and Retention of Facts. , 1970 .

[14]  Ernst Z. Rothkopf,et al.  Learning from Written Sentences: Effects of Order of Presentation on Retention , 1962 .

[15]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[16]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A process model for long-term memory. , 1972 .

[17]  John R. Anderson,et al.  RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL PROCESSES IN FREE RECALL , 1972 .

[18]  R. Atkinson,et al.  The control of short-term memory. , 1971, Scientific American.

[19]  Lawrence T. Frase,et al.  Some Adaptive Consequences of Searching for Information in a Text , 1970 .

[20]  Robert F. Simmons,et al.  A semantic analyzer for English sentences , 1968, Mech. Transl. Comput. Linguistics.

[21]  W. H. Huggins,et al.  Interference in meaningful learning. , 1964 .

[22]  Lawrence T. Frase,et al.  Cybernetic Control of Memory While Reading Connected Discourse. ,pag 49-55. , 1969 .

[23]  Samuel Fillenbaum,et al.  On the use of memorial techniques to assess syntactic structures. , 1970 .