Electronically Switchable Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) System

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly being used to demonstrate the causal links between brain and behavior in humans. Further, extensive clinical trials are being conducted to investigate the therapeutic role of TMS in disorders such as depression. Because TMS causes strong peripheral effects such as auditory clicks and muscle twitches, experimental artifacts such as subject bias and placebo effect are clear concerns. Several sham TMS methods have been developed, but none of the techniques allows one to intermix real and sham TMS on a trial-by-trial basis in a double-blind manner. We have developed an attachment that allows fast, automated switching between Standard TMS and two types of control TMS (Sham and Reverse) without movement of the coil or reconfiguration of the setup. We validate the setup by performing mathematical modeling, search-coil and physiological measurements. To see if the stimulus conditions can be blinded, we conduct perceptual discrimination and sensory perception studies. We verify that the physical properties of the stimulus are appropriate, and that successive stimuli do not contaminate each other. We find that the threshold for motor activation is significantly higher for Reversed than for Standard stimulation, and that Sham stimulation entirely fails to activate muscle potentials. Subjects and experimenters perform poorly at discriminating between Sham and Standard TMS with a figure-of-eight coil, and between Reverse and Standard TMS with a circular coil. Our results raise the possibility of utilizing this technique for a wide range of applications.

[1]  M. Hallett,et al.  Non-invasive differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by mapping of optimal current directions. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  V. Amassian,et al.  Modelling magnetic coil excitation of human cerebral cortex with a peripheral nerve immersed in a brain-shaped volume conductor: the significance of fiber bending in excitation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Hallett,et al.  Optimal Focal Transcranial Magnetic Activation of the Human Motor Cortex: Effects of Coil Orientation, Shape of the Induced Current Pulse, and Stimulus Intensity , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[4]  M. Erb,et al.  The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Kiernan,et al.  Novel threshold tracking techniques suggest that cortical hyperexcitability is an early feature of motor neuron disease. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.

[7]  K. Sakai,et al.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[9]  Zafiris J Daskalakis,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a new investigational and treatment tool in psychiatry. , 2002, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[10]  Y. Kim,et al.  Motor recovery mechanism of diffuse axonal injury: a combined study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI. , 2005, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[11]  C. Kennard,et al.  Current orientation induced by magnetic stimulation influences a cognitive task , 2000, Neuroreport.

[12]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[13]  A. Robinson The Science of the Placebo , 2008 .

[14]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[15]  Ichiro Kanazawa,et al.  0.2‐Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has no add‐on effects as compared to a realistic sham stimulation in Parkinson's disease , 2003, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[16]  Juha Virtanen,et al.  Coil design for real and sham transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Use of placebo control groups in evaluating efficacy of treatment of unipolar major depression , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[18]  A T Barker,et al.  Magnetic nerve stimulation: the effect of waveform on efficiency, determination of neural membrane time constants and the measurement of stimulator output. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[19]  A T Barker,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Which part of the current waveform causes the stimulation? , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[20]  P. Basser,et al.  A model of the stimulation of a nerve fiber by electromagnetic induction , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  E. Chronicle,et al.  Visual cortex excitability in migraine before and after valproate prophylaxis: a pilot study using TMS , 2002, European journal of neurology.

[22]  S. Boniface,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  Robert Chen Studies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Muscle & nerve. Supplement.

[24]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation--a new tool for functional imaging of the brain. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[26]  Garnham Cw,et al.  Magnetic nerve stimulation: the effect of waveform on efficiency, determination of neural membrane time constants and the measurement of stimulator output. , 1991 .

[27]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Inferring causality in brain images: a perturbation approach , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Scott T. Aaronson Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Psychiatry , 2008 .

[29]  H. Topka,et al.  Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  K. Mills Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Neurophysiology , 1991 .

[31]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders , 2003, Psychopharmacology.

[32]  A. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[34]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  D. Long,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Neurochronometrics of Mind , 2004 .