Statistical Learning of Melodic Patterns Influences the Brain's Response to Wrong Notes
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E. Sussman,et al. The Five Myths of MMN: Redefining How to Use MMN in Basic and Clinical Research , 2014, Brain Topography.
[2] Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al. Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.
[3] K. Reinikainen,et al. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory , 1994, Nature.
[4] I. Winkler,et al. ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.
[5] E. Sussman. A New View on the MMN and Attention Debate The Role of Context in Processing Auditory Events , 2007 .
[6] Risto Näätänen,et al. Event-related potentials reveal how non-attended complex sound patterns are represented by the human brain , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.
[7] John Shawe-Taylor,et al. Neural prediction of higher-order auditory sequence statistics , 2011, NeuroImage.
[8] Paavo Alku,et al. Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.
[9] A. Friederici,et al. Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[10] P. Jusczyk,et al. Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.
[11] Mari Tervaniemi,et al. Grouping of Sequential SoundsAn Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[12] R. Näätänen. Implications of ERP data for psychological theories of attention , 1988, Biological Psychology.
[13] Y. Dan,et al. Activity Recall in Visual Cortical Ensemble , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.
[14] M. Goldsmith,et al. Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .
[15] O. Schwartz,et al. Distinguishing Neural Adaptation and Predictive Coding Hypotheses in Auditory Change Detection , 2016, Brain Topography.
[16] Risto Näätänen,et al. Implicit, Intuitive, and Explicit Knowledge of Abstract Regularities in a Sound Sequence: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[17] Minna Huotilainen,et al. Implicit Segmentation of a Stream of Syllables Based on Transitional Probabilities: An MEG Study , 2012, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[18] D. Lehmann,et al. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[19] P. Jusczyk,et al. Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.
[20] Sue L. Denham,et al. A Neurocomputational Model of Stimulus-Specific Adaptation to Oddball and Markov Sequences , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[21] Janet F Werker,et al. Learning non-adjacent regularities at age 0 ; 7. , 2013, Journal of child language.
[22] Christopher M. Conway,et al. Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us? , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[23] Karl J. Friston,et al. The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[24] R. Näätänen,et al. Automatic auditory intelligence: An expression of the sensory–cognitive core of cognitive processes , 2010, Brain Research Reviews.
[25] J. Werker,et al. Tuned to the signal: the privileged status of speech for young infants. , 2004, Developmental science.
[26] Hugo Lagercrantz,et al. Language experienced in utero affects vowel perception after birth: a two‐country study , 2013, Acta paediatrica.
[27] E. Newport,et al. Science Current Directions in Psychological Statistical Learning : from Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .
[28] A. Woodward,et al. Infants' sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech , 1996, Journal of Child Language.
[29] A. Decasper,et al. Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns' perception of speech sounds , 1986 .
[30] P. Jusczyk,et al. Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.
[31] N. Cowan,et al. Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task. , 2000, Psychophysiology.
[32] Sibylle C. Herholz,et al. Statistical learning effects in musicians and non-musicians: An MEG study , 2012, Neuropsychologia.
[33] W. Ritter,et al. An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. , 1999, Psychophysiology.
[34] Stefan Koelsch,et al. Under the hood of statistical learning: A statistical MMN reflects the magnitude of transitional probabilities in auditory sequences , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[35] E. Schröger,et al. Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions. , 1995, Psychophysiology.
[36] I. Winkler,et al. Top-down effects can modify the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[37] K. Campbell,et al. Evidence that the mismatch negativity to pattern violations does not vary with deviant probability , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[38] R. Ilmoniemi,et al. Superior formation of cortical memory traces for melodic patterns in musicians. , 2001, Learning & memory.
[39] M. Tervaniemi,et al. Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. , 1992, Neuroreport.