Modeling evolutionary landscapes: mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space.

Random mutations under neutral or near-neutral conditions are studied by considering plausible evolutionary trajectories on "neutral nets"-i.e., collections of sequences (genotypes) interconnected via single-point mutations encoding for the same ground-state structure (phenotype). We use simple exact lattice models for the mapping between sequence and conformational spaces. Densities of states based on model intrachain interactions are determined by exhaustive conformational enumeration. We compare results from two very different interaction schemes to ascertain robustness of the conclusions. In both models, sequences in a majority of neutral nets center around a single "prototype sequence" of maximum mutational stability, tolerating the largest number of neutral mutations. General analytical considerations show that these topologies by themselves lead to higher steady-state evolutionary populations at prototype sequences. On average, native thermodynamic stability increases toward a maximum at the prototype sequence, resulting in funnel-like arrangements of native stabilities in sequence space. These observations offer a unified perspective on sequence design, native stability, and mutational stability of proteins. These principles are generalizable from native stability to any measure of fitness provided that its variation with respect to mutations is essentially smooth.

[1]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  Natural Selection and the Concept of a Protein Space , 1970, Nature.

[2]  M. Kimura,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 1983, Scientific American.

[3]  J M Sturtevant,et al.  Increasing and decreasing protein stability: Effects of revertant substitutions on the thermal denaturation of phage λ repressor , 1985, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[4]  R. Sauer,et al.  Stabilization of λ repressor against thermal denaturation by site‐directed Gly→Ala changes in α‐helix 3 , 1986 .

[5]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P. Schuster,et al.  A computer model of evolutionary optimization. , 1987, Biophysical chemistry.

[8]  W. Lim,et al.  Deciphering the message in protein sequences: tolerance to amino acid substitutions. , 1990, Science.

[9]  K. Dill,et al.  Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  W E Stites,et al.  Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[11]  D. Lipman,et al.  Modelling neutral and selective evolution of protein folding , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  K. Dill,et al.  ‘‘Sequence space soup’’ of proteins and copolymers , 1991 .

[13]  D. Shortle,et al.  Contributions of the polar, uncharged amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease: evidence for mutational effects on the free energy of the denatured state. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[14]  K. Dill,et al.  Inverse protein folding problem: designing polymer sequences. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  G. Petsko,et al.  Crystalline ribonuclease A loses function below the dynamical transition at 220 K , 1992, Nature.

[16]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Protein folding funnels: a kinetic approach to the sequence-structure relationship. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  K. Dill,et al.  Modeling the effects of mutations on the denatured states of proteins , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  Robert T. Sauer,et al.  Protein stability effects of a complete set of alanine substitutions in Arc repressor , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  K. Dill,et al.  Transition states and folding dynamics of proteins and heteropolymers , 1994 .

[20]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[21]  D. Yee,et al.  Principles of protein folding — A perspective from simple exact models , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Evolution-like selection of fast-folding model proteins. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Contributions of the ionizable amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. , 1996 .

[24]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Kinetics of Folding of Proteins and RNA , 1996 .

[26]  K. Dill,et al.  Comparing folding codes for proteins and polymers , 1996, Proteins.

[27]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Emergence of Preferred Structures in a Simple Model of Protein Folding , 1996, Science.

[28]  R A Goldstein,et al.  The foldability landscape of model proteins , 1997, Biopolymers.

[29]  Seiji Saito,et al.  Evolution of the folding ability of proteins through functional selection. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  W Nadler,et al.  Protein folding: optimized sequences obtained by simulated breeding in a minimalist model. , 1997, Biopolymers.

[31]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Thermodynamic stability of folded proteins against mutations , 1997, cond-mat/9709078.

[32]  K. Dill,et al.  From Levinthal to pathways to funnels , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[33]  E. Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space? , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[34]  D Baker,et al.  The sequences of small proteins are not extensively optimized for rapid folding by natural selection. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  S. Héry,et al.  Enzyme activity below the dynamical transition at 220 K. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[36]  P. Schuster,et al.  IR-98-039 / April Continuity in Evolution : On the Nature of Transitions , 1998 .

[37]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Proposed mechanism for stability of proteins to evolutionary mutations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  A protein engineering analysis of the transition state for protein folding: simulation in the lattice model. , 1998, Folding & design.

[39]  K. Dill,et al.  Protein folding in the landscape perspective: Chevron plots and non‐arrhenius kinetics , 1998, Proteins.

[40]  F. Cohen,et al.  Thermodynamics of model prions and its implications for the problem of prion protein folding. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Effect of alphabet size and foldability requirements on protein structure designability , 1999, Proteins.

[42]  P. Schuster,et al.  Complete suboptimal folding of RNA and the stability of secondary structures. , 1999, Biopolymers.

[43]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Designability, thermodynamic stability, and dynamics in protein folding: A lattice model study , 1998, cond-mat/9806197.