Negotiation Model Based on Artificial Intelligence in the E-Commerce

Electronic negotiations are becoming an important research subject in the area of electronic commerce. Decision analysis and especially multiattributive utility theory play an important role for the support of electronic negotiations. The preferences are usually represented as a utility function on the set of alternatives such that the user prefers an alternative exactly when it has higher utility. Successful experience of the human traditional negotiation is the valuable learning resources of automatic negotiation. Automated negotiation model can learn from past experience in negotiation, reason, and give a reasonable choice of negotiations on a new strategy. The ANN and the CBR are two approaches of Artificial Intelligence that use similarity in an extensive way. Case-based reasoning and neural network have a natural link between the two. So it is put forward model of the negotiations based on neural network and case-based reasoning. It can lead that negotiation can be achieved very good results.

[1]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an , 1997 .

[2]  Alneu de Andrade Lopes,et al.  Integrating Rules and Cases in Learning via Case Explanation and Paradigm Shift , 2000, IBERAMIA-SBIA.

[3]  R. Luce,et al.  Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .

[4]  Claudio Bartolini,et al.  AutONA: a system for automated multiple 1-1 negotiation , 2003, EC '03.

[5]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[6]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agent-Mediated Integrative Negotiation for Retail Electronic Commerce , 1998, AMET.

[8]  Henrik Sattler,et al.  A Comparison of Conjoint Measurement with Self-Explicated Approaches , 2007 .

[9]  Sander M. Bohte,et al.  Automated Negotiation and Bundling of Information Goods , 2003, AMEC.

[10]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[11]  Chan Su Park,et al.  Surprising Robustness of the Self-Explicated Approach to Customer Preference Structure Measurement , 1997 .

[12]  Jacques L. Koko,et al.  The Art and Science of Negotiation , 2009 .

[13]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  Bargaining and Markets , 1991 .

[14]  J. Nash.  THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[15]  Francisco Jurado.  Fuzzy Logic Control of a Combined-Cycle Power Plant Using Biomass , 2003 .

[16]  Martin Bichler,et al.  ABSolute: an intelligent decision making framework for e-sourcing , 2001, Proceedings Third International Workshop on Advanced Issues of E-Commerce and Web-Based Information Systems. WECWIS 2001.

[17]  Adnan Sözen,et al.  Exergy analysis of an ejector-absorption heat transformer using artificial neural network approach , 2007 .

[18]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental Data , 1971 .

[19]  Michael Stroebel,et al.  Effects of Electronic Markets on Negotiation Processes , 2000, ECIS.