Reaction time of a health care team to monitoring alarms in the intensive care unit: implications for the safety of seriously ill patients

Objective To define the characteristics and measure the reaction time of a health care team monitoring alarms in the intensive care unit. Methods A quantitative, observational, and descriptive study developed at the coronary care unit of a cardiology public hospital in Rio de Janeiro state (RJ). Data were obtained from the information collected on the patients, the monitoring used, and the measurement of the team's reaction time to the alarms of multi-parameter monitors during a non-participatory field observation. Results Eighty-eight patients were followed (49 during the day shift and 39 during the night shift). During the 40 hours of observation (20 hours during the day shift and 20 hours during the night shift), the total number of monitoring alarms was 227, with 106 alarms during the day shift and 121 during the night shift, an average of 5.7 alarms/hour. In total, 145 alarms unanswered by the team were observed, with 68 occurring during the day shift (64.15%) and 77 during the night shift (63.64%). This study demonstrated that the reaction time was longer than 10 minutes in more than 60% of the alarms, which were considered as unanswered alarms. The median reaction time of the answered alarms was 4 minutes and 54 seconds during the day shift and 4 minutes and 55 seconds during the night shift. The respiration monitoring was activated in only nine patients (23.07%) during the night shift. Regarding the alarm quality of these variables, the arrhythmia alarm was qualified in only 10 (20.40%) of the day-shift patients and the respiration alarm in four night-shift patients (44.44%). Conclusion The programming and configuration of the physiological variables monitored and the parameters of alarms in the intensive care unit were inadequate; there was a delay and lack of response to the alarms, suggesting that relevant alarms may have been ignored by the health care team, thus compromising the patient safety.

[1]  S. Timerman,et al.  I guideline for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care -- Brazilian Society of Cardiology: executive summary. , 2013, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[2]  Top 10 health technology hazards for 2014. , 2013, Health devices.

[3]  L. Barros,et al.  Conceito Fase-Dependente na Ressuscitação Cardiopulmonar Phase-Dependent Concept in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , 2007 .

[4]  C. Tsien,et al.  Poor prognosis for existing monitors in the intensive care unit. , 1997, Critical care medicine.

[5]  American association of critical-care nurses. , 1975, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[6]  Lúcia Marinilza Beccaria,et al.  Eventos adversos na assistncia de enfermagem em uma unidade de terapia intensiva , 2009 .

[7]  K. Graham,et al.  Monitor alarm fatigue: standardizing use of physiological monitors and decreasing nuisance alarms. , 2010, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[8]  M. Imhoff,et al.  Alarm Algorithms in Critical Care Monitoring , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  James M Blum,et al.  Alarms in the intensive care unit: too much of a good thing is dangerous: is it time to add some intelligence to alarms? , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[10]  U. Gather,et al.  Intensive care unit alarms—How many do we need?* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[11]  Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho,et al.  Hipotermia terapêutica pós-reanimação cardiorrespiratória: evidências e aspectos práticos , 2009 .

[12]  Yadin David,et al.  A national online survey on the effectiveness of clinical alarms. , 2008, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[13]  L. Correia,et al.  Valor Prognóstico do Escore de Risco GRACE versus Escore de Risco TIMI em Síndromes Coronarianas Agudas Prognostic Value of GRACE Scores versus TIMI Score in Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2010 .

[14]  C. Kuziemsky,et al.  The Helpful or Hindering Effects of In-Hospital Patient Monitor Alarms on Nurses: A Qualitative Analysis , 2012, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[15]  Top 10 health technology hazards for 2013. , 2012, Health devices.

[16]  M. Chambrin,et al.  Multicentric study of monitoring alarms in the adult intensive care unit (ICU): a descriptive analysis , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[17]  Fernando Sabia Tallo,et al.  Atualização em reanimação cardiopulmonar: uma revisão para o clínico , 2012 .

[18]  J F Solsona,et al.  Are auditory warnings in the intensive care unit properly adjusted? , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  J. Edworthy,et al.  Are there too many alarms in the intensive care unit? An overview of the problems. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[20]  M. Cvach.  Monitor alarm fatigue: an integrative review. , 2012, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[21]  M. Chambrin.  Alarms in the intensive care unit: how can the number of false alarms be reduced? , 2001, Critical care.

[22]  Steven Dain,et al.  Current equipment alarm sounds: friend or foe? , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[23]  R Hétu,et al.  Audibility and identification of auditory alarms in the operating room and intensive care unit. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[24]  Top 10 technology hazards for 2012. The risks that should be at the top of your prevention list. , 2011, Health devices.

[25]  P. Póvoa,et al.  Papel neuroprotector da hipotermia terapêutica pós paragem cardio-respiratória , 2011 .

[26]  F. Tarasoutchi,et al.  I Diretriz de Ressuscitação Cardiopulmonar e Cuidados Cardiovasculares de Emergência da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia , 2013 .

[27]  Ursula Gather,et al.  Collection of annotated data in a clinical validation study for alarm algorithms in intensive care--a methodologic framework. , 2010, Journal of critical care.