Collaborative learning framework for online stakeholder engagement

Public and stakeholder engagement can improve the quality of both research and policy decision making. However, such engagement poses significant methodological challenges in terms of collecting and analysing input from large, diverse groups.

[1]  Geneviève Daudelin,et al.  Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics? , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .

[3]  D. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .

[4]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[5]  W. Heath.  The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2008 .

[6]  Susanne Hempel,et al.  Conducting Online Expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[7]  Gene Rowe,et al.  Stakeholder engagement in food risk management , 2011 .

[8]  J. Greatorex,et al.  An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[10]  F. Woudenberg.  An Evaluation of Delphi , 1991 .

[11]  Charles C. Harris,et al.  A participatory approach to social impact assessment: The interactive community forum , 2003 .

[12]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Kenneth Wells,et al.  Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. , 2007, JAMA.

[14]  Joseph D Mango,et al.  An Exploration of the Effect of Community Engagement in Research on Perceived Outcomes of Partnered Mental Health Services Projects , 2011, Society and mental health.

[15]  Shawna L. Mercer,et al.  The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. , 2008, Annual review of public health.

[16]  F. Strack,et al.  The Semantics of Anchoring , 2001 .

[17]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[18]  David W. Keith,et al.  When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments? , 1996 .

[19]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[20]  Experiences and wisdom behind the numbers: qualitative analysis of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention's Research Prioritization Task Force stakeholder survey. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[21]  S. Dalal,et al.  Reducing the burden of suicide in the U.S.: the aspirational research goals of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention Research Prioritization Task Force. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[23]  G. Martin.  Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[24]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health Disparities , 2006, Health promotion practice.

[25]  S. Bunting,et al.  Assessing the Stakeholder Delphi for Facilitating Interactive Participation and Consensus Building for Sustainable Aquaculture Development , 2010 .

[26]  Suzanne Christopher,et al.  Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[27]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Why national eHealth programs need dead philosophers: Wittgensteinian reflections on policymakers' reluctance to learn from history. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[28]  Allen Dearry,et al.  Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[29]  Erin Holve,et al.  Involving Patients and Consumers in Research: New Opportunities for Meaningful Engagement in Research and Quality Improvement , 2012 .

[30]  Anne C. Beal,et al.  The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. , 2012, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[31]  Pauline Allen,et al.  On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. , 2003, The Milbank quarterly.

[32]  George Wright,et al.  Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique , 2001 .

[33]  C. Fiol.  Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. , 1994 .

[34]  Lisa Werner,et al.  Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners , 2002 .

[35]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  A social choice approach to expert consensus panels. , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[36]  S. Feldman.  Measuring Issue Preferences: The Problem of Response Instability , 1989, Political Analysis.

[37]  A. P. Meijler,et al.  Panellist consistency in the assessment of medical appropriateness. , 1996, Health policy.

[38]  Jenny Donovan,et al.  'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[39]  F. Hasson,et al.  A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. , 2001, International journal of nursing studies.

[40]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  ExpertLens: A System for Eliciting Opinions from a Large Pool of Non-Collocated Experts with Diverse Knowledge , 2011 .

[41]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[42]  T. Tenbensel.  Virtual special issue introduction: Public participation in health policy in high income countries--a review of why, who, what, which, and where? , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[43]  Harold G. Wolff,et al.  Social Science in Medicine , 1955, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[44]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[45]  B. Burnand,et al.  The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual , 2001 .

[46]  V. Wiseman,et al.  Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[47]  S. Daniels,et al.  Working Through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach , 2001 .

[48]  S. Page.  Prologue to The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2007 .

[49]  Rebecca R. Cheezum,et al.  Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[50]  A Eugene Washington,et al.  The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute--promoting better information, decisions, and health. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  P. Aitken,et al.  Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four‐arm Delphi study , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[52]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture , 1995 .

[53]  Susan J. Smith,et al.  Genetics, insurance and participation: how a Citizens' Jury reached its verdict. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[54]  Kenneth Wells,et al.  "Research" in community-partnered, participatory research. , 2009, JAMA.

[55]  Martin Steinert,et al.  A dissensus based online Delphi approach: An explorative research tool , 2009 .

[56]  Kathryn H. Bowles,et al.  Expert Consensus for Discharge Referral Decisions Using Online Delphi , 2003, AMIA.

[57]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Finding middle ground: negotiating university and tribal community interests in community-based participatory research. , 2012, Nursing inquiry.

[58]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[59]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  F J Schiesser,et al.  How do you think? , 1975, Pennsylvania dental journal.

[61]  F. Galton.  Vox Populi , 1907, Nature.