Manifold projection image segmentation for nano-XANES imaging

As spectral imaging techniques are becoming more prominent in science, advanced image segmentation algorithms are required to identify appropriate domains in these images. We present a version of image segmentation called manifold projection image segmentation (MPIS) that is generally applicable to a broad range of systems without the need for training because MPIS uses unsupervised machine learning with a few physically motivated hyperparameters. We apply MPIS to nanoscale x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) imaging, where XANES spectra are collected with nanometer spatial resolution. We show the superiority of manifold projection over linear transformations, such as the commonly used principal component analysis (PCA). Moreover, MPIS maintains accuracy while reducing computation time and sensitivity to noise compared to the standard nano-XANES imaging analysis procedure. Finally, we demonstrate how multimodal information, such as x-ray fluorescence data and spatial location of pixels, can be incorporated into the MPIS framework. We propose that MPIS is adaptable for any spectral imaging technique, including scanning transmission x-ray microscopy, where the length scale of domains is larger than the resolution of the experiment.

[1]  Matthews Marcus Data analysis in spectroscopic STXM , 2023, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena.

[2]  Hanfei Yan,et al.  Multimodal X-ray nano-spectromicroscopy analysis of chemically heterogeneous systems , 2022, Metallomics : integrated biometal science.

[3]  M. Figlerowicz,et al.  Dimensionality reduction by UMAP for visualizing and aiding in classification of imaging flow cytometry data , 2022, iScience.

[4]  N. Govind,et al.  Informed Chemical Classification of Organophosphorus Compounds via Unsupervised Machine Learning of X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and X-ray Emission Spectroscopy. , 2022, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[5]  Pei Wang,et al.  Multi-Species Individual Tree Segmentation and Identification Based on Improved Mask R-CNN and UAV Imagery in Mixed Forests , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[6]  N. Govind,et al.  Unsupervised machine learning for unbiased chemical classification in X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray emission spectroscopy. , 2021, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[7]  P. Sorger,et al.  UnMICST: Deep learning with real augmentation for robust segmentation of highly multiplexed images of human tissues , 2021, bioRxiv.

[8]  Ruichuan Yin,et al.  Spatial Segmentation of Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data by Combining Multivariate Clustering and Univariate Thresholding. , 2020, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  M. Ge,et al.  High-sensitivity nanoscale chemical imaging with hard x-ray nano-XANES , 2020, Science Advances.

[10]  Miin-Shen Yang,et al.  Unsupervised K-Means Clustering Algorithm , 2020, IEEE Access.

[11]  Michael Hahsler,et al.  dbscan: Fast Density-Based Clustering with R , 2019, Journal of Statistical Software.

[12]  O. Mathon,et al.  Germanium Crystal Chemistry in Cu-Bearing Sulfides from Micro-XRF Mapping and Micro-XANES Spectroscopy , 2019, Minerals.

[13]  Leland McInnes,et al.  UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[14]  Nathalie Bouet,et al.  Multimodal hard x-ray imaging with resolution approaching 10 nm for studies in material science , 2018 .

[15]  Y S Chu,et al.  Design and performance of an X-ray scanning microscope at the Hard X-ray Nanoprobe beamline of NSLS-II. , 2017, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[16]  Hanfei Yan,et al.  PyXRF: Python-based X-ray fluorescence analysis package , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[17]  E. Borfecchia,et al.  Iron oxidation state variations in zoned micro-crystals measured using micro-XANES , 2014 .

[18]  Wenkai Li,et al.  Delineating Individual Trees from Lidar Data: A Comparison of Vector- and Raster-based Segmentation Approaches , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[19]  A. Freer,et al.  Micro-XANES mapping of sulphur and its association with magnesium and phosphorus in the shell of the brachiopod, Terebratulina retusa , 2008 .

[20]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Maximum-likelihood techniques for joint segmentation-classification of multispectral chromosome images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  M Newville,et al.  ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. , 2005, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[22]  Jörg Maser,et al.  Cluster analysis in soft X-ray spectromicroscopy : Finding the patterns in complex specimens , 2005 .

[23]  J. Susini,et al.  Micro X-ray absorption near edge structure at the sulfur and iron K-edges in natural silicate glasses , 2002 .

[24]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[25]  K. Esbensen,et al.  Principal component analysis , 1987 .

[26]  Evan P. Jahrman,et al.  Assessing Arsenic Species in Foods Using Regularized Linear Regression of the Arsenic K-edge X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure. , 2022, Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry.

[27]  Michael Unser,et al.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..