The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: an empirical analysis from the secondary sector

There has been considerable investment in the use of interactive whiteboard technology in schools in the UK. There is evidence that whilst teachers understand such technology, many do not understand the nature and implications of interactive learning. Observation and analysis of 50 video‐recorded lessons taught by ‘successful’ teachers drawn from mathematics and modern foreign language departments in secondary schools led to the classification of three types of practice representing a spectrum of increasing interactivity. The nature of this good practice was analysed together with criteria for assessing the changes being wrought by technology in approaches to learning and teaching. The investigation concluded that the use of new technology alone cannot lead to enhanced learning. Teachers also need training to develop awareness of the relationship between approaches to interactive learning and conceptual and cognitive development in subject areas.

[1]  Ann E. Chun,et al.  Attitudes and Preferences of ESL Students to Error Correction , 1983, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  Robert Munro,et al.  Using information and communications technology as a pedagogical tool: a survey of initial teacher education in Scotland , 1998 .

[3]  Paul Brna,et al.  Supporting High Quality Interaction and Motivation in the Classroom Using ICT: the social and emotional learning and engagement in the NIMIS project , 2002 .

[4]  David Miller,et al.  Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school , 2001 .

[5]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard , 2005 .

[6]  David Miller,et al.  The interactive whiteboard: a literature survey , 2005 .

[7]  Don Passey,et al.  The Motivational Effect of ICT on Pupils: emerging findings , 2003 .

[8]  Matthew Rockloff,et al.  Focused Interactive Learning: A Tool for Active Class Discussion , 2002 .

[9]  Julie-Ann Edwards,et al.  Interactive Whiteboards: Some lessons from the classroom , 2002 .

[10]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: towards an effective transition framework , 2004 .

[11]  Steve Higgins,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  Derek Glover,et al.  Players in the Management of Change , 2003 .

[13]  R. Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases , 1989 .

[14]  Marie K. Iding Is Seeing Believing? Features of Effective Multimedia for Learning Science , 2000 .

[15]  Catherine S. Jarjisian The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach , 1992 .

[16]  Howard Tanner,et al.  Teachers' Interpretations of Effective Whole-class Interactive Teaching in Secondary Mathematics Classrooms , 2002 .