The Community Empowerment Act and localism under devolution in Scotland

PurposeIn Scotland, the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act represents a significant development towards greater localism in the way public services are designed and delivered in Scotland. This also represents a different approach to that adopted in the rest of the UK. The purpose of this paper is to explore the stakeholder perceptions of localism within a council ward.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on an in-depth exploratory case study of a single council ward in East Scotland. The fieldwork involved 61 in-depth interviews with multiple stakeholders including local councillors, public service managers and residents.FindingsThe findings highlight that, whilst the discourse of community empowerment represents policy divergence, there remain some significant structural and social barriers to meaningful community empowerment in practice. Finally, it is argued that there are three key factors to consider when developing community empowerment: a shared strategy, shared resources and shared accountability.Originality/valueThe research draws on extensive data from an in-depth case study to explore the realities of community empowerment within a single local authority ward. In doing so, it provides a rich contextual narrative of how the rhetoric of community empowerment is perceived within a council ward setting.

[1]  Anke Fischer,et al.  A question of capacities? Community resilience and empowerment between assets, abilities and relationships , 2017 .

[2]  P. Cairney,et al.  The 'Scottish approach' to policy and policymaking: what issues are territorial and what are universal? , 2016 .

[3]  S. Rolfe.  Divergence in Community Participation Policy: Analysing Localism and Community Empowerment Using a Theory of Change Approach , 2016 .

[4]  Mark van Twist,et al.  Assessing and Appraising the Effects of Policy for Wicked Issues: Including Unforeseen Achievements in the Evaluation of the District Policy for Deprived Areas in The Netherlands , 2015 .

[5]  N. Bailey,et al.  Can the State Empower Communities through Localism? An Evaluation of Recent Approaches to Neighbourhood Governance in England , 2015 .

[6]  A. Emejulu,et al.  Neoliberalism With a Community Face? A Critical Analysis of Asset-Based Community Development in Scotland , 2014 .

[7]  P. Matthews,et al.  Poverty and social networks evidence review , 2014 .

[8]  P. Matthews.  Being Strategic in Partnership – Interpreting Local Knowledge of Modern Local Government , 2014 .

[9]  A. Kearns,et al.  Rethinking the purpose of community empowerment in neighbourhood regeneration: The need for policy clarity , 2014 .

[10]  T. Jones,et al.  Localism and Accountability in a Post-Collaborative Era: Where Does It Leave the Community Right to Challenge? , 2014 .

[11]  Peter Housden.  This is us: A perspective on public services in Scotland , 2014 .

[12]  Dave Adamson,et al.  Community empowerment: learning from practice in community regeneration , 2013 .

[13]  M. Buser.  Tracing the Democratic Narrative: Big Society, Localism and Civic Engagement , 2013 .

[14]  A. Hastings,et al.  Middle-Class Political Activism and Middle-Class Advantage in Relation to Public Services: A Realist Synthesis of the Evidence Base , 2013 .

[15]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  What Can Social Capital Tell Us About Planning Under Localism? , 2013 .

[16]  N. Bailey,et al.  Community Empowerment or a Strategy of Containment? Evaluating Neighbourhood Governance in the City of Westminster , 2012 .

[17]  M. Keating,et al.  Scottish Policy Innovation Forum: Localism and Local Governance: Scotland in Context , 2012 .

[18]  S. Jeffares,et al.  Four Viewpoints of Whole Area Public Partnerships , 2012 .

[19]  Vivien Lowndes,et al.  Cuts, collaboration and creativity , 2012 .

[20]  M. Lipscomb.  Questioning the use value of qualitative research findings. , 2012, Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals.

[21]  P. Matthews.  From Area-Based Initiatives to Strategic Partnerships: Have We Lost the Meaning of Regeneration? , 2012 .

[22]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  Local Governance under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’ , 2012 .

[23]  A. Hastings,et al.  Serving deprived communities in a recession , 2012 .

[24]  Stephen D. Lapan,et al.  Qualitative research : an introduction to methods and designs , 2012 .

[25]  S. Sinclair.  Partnership or Presence? Exploring the Complexity of Community Planning , 2011 .

[26]  Toby Blume,et al.  Poverty, power and policy dilemmas: Lessons from the community empowerment programme in England , 2011 .

[27]  A. Hastings,et al.  Connectivity and Conflict in Periods of Austerity: What do we Know about Middle Class Political Activism and its Effects on Public Services? , 2011 .

[28]  Peter G. Swanborn,et al.  Case Study Research: What, Why and How? , 2010 .

[29]  A. Kearns,et al.  ‘Community Empowerment’ in the Context of the Glasgow Housing Stock Transfer , 2010 .

[30]  D. Silverman.  Doing Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[31]  Linda Milbourne.  Remodelling the Third Sector: Advancing Collaboration or Competition in Community-Based Initiatives? , 2009, Journal of Social Policy.

[32]  S. Sinclair.  Dilemmas of Community Planning , 2008 .

[33]  N. Mcgarvey,et al.  Scottish Politics: An Introduction , 2008 .

[34]  Cyrus Martin.  Power lines , 2008, Current Biology.

[35]  Dave Adamson,et al.  Community empowerment in practice : lessons from Communities First , 2008 .

[36]  Ron Baiman,et al.  Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance , 2006 .

[37]  T. Entwistle,et al.  The three challenges of community leadership , 2006 .

[38]  Michael Carley,et al.  Partnership and statutory local governance in a devolved Scotland , 2006 .

[39]  Nicholas Walliman,et al.  Social research methods , 2006 .

[40]  P. Kirk,et al.  Community leadership development , 2004 .

[41]  C. Milligan,et al.  Putting the Voluntary Sector in its Place: Geographical Perspectives on Voluntary Activity and Social Welfare in Glasgow , 2004, Journal of Social Policy.

[42]  John Gaventa,et al.  Towards Participatory Local Governance: Assessing the Transformative Possibilities. , 2003 .

[43]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo , 2002 .

[44]  J. Rowley.  Using case studies in research , 2002 .

[45]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Measuring community empowerment: a fresh look at organizational domains. , 2001, Health promotion international.

[46]  Archon Fung,et al.  Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance , 2001 .

[47]  Rob Atkinson,et al.  Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration , 1999 .

[48]  A. Bassi,et al.  Unpacking the State: The Implications for the Third Sector of Changing Relationships Between National and Local Government , 1998 .

[49]  S. Rifkin.  Community participation in maternal and child health/family planning programmes: an analysis based on case study materials. , 1990 .