The impact of European balancing rules on wind power economics and on short-term bidding strategies

Wind power represents a significant percentage of the European generation mix and this will increase to fulfill the renewable energy targets. Different balancing rules are applied to wind power among the countries; for instance, to what extent wind power producers (WPPs) are responsible for the energy imbalances and how those imbalances are penalized. This paper discusses those different rules and evaluates their effects on WPP bidding strategies. To do so, a quantitative analysis is presented for an offshore wind farm, considering the differences in the balancing rules and prices of Belgium, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. The quantitative approach consists of a stochastic optimization model that maximizes the profits of a WPP by trading in different markets (day-ahead and intraday) and computes the final energy delivered. The model considers uncertainties of most important parameters such as wind energy forecasts and prices at different time frames. The results show that the imbalance pricing design and the allocation of balance responsibility significantly affect WPP’ revenues. Additionally, WPPs deviate differently from the expected energy depending on the balancing rules, which can impact the system. Furthermore, these balancing rules should be considered with other market regulations, such as the design of support schemes.

[1]  A. Conejo,et al.  Decision making under uncertainty in electricity markets , 2010, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[2]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Adequate intraday market design to enable the integration of wind energy into the European power systems , 2010 .

[3]  Rudi A. Hakvoort,et al.  Balance responsibility and imbalance settlement in Northern Europe — An evaluation , 2009, 2009 6th International Conference on the European Energy Market.

[4]  John D. C. Little,et al.  On model building , 1993 .

[5]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Assessment of imbalance settlement exemptions for offshore wind power generation in Belgium , 2011 .

[6]  J. R. Abbad Electricity market participation of wind farms: the success story of the Spanish pragmatism , 2010 .

[7]  J. Glachant,et al.  Well-functioning balancing markets: A prerequisite for wind power integration , 2010 .

[8]  José Pablo Chaves-Ávila,et al.  Short-term strategies for Dutch wind power producers to reduce imbalance costs , 2013 .

[9]  R. A. C. van der Veen,et al.  A comparison of imbalance settlement designs and results of Germany and the Netherlands , 2010 .

[10]  M. Saguan,et al.  Large-scale wind power in European electricity markets: Time for revisiting support schemes and market designs? , 2010 .

[11]  O. S. Grande,et al.  Exchange of balancing resources between the Nordic synchronous system and the Netherlands / Germany / Poland , 2008 .

[12]  Karsten Burges,et al.  Pros and cons of exposing renewables to electricity market risks--A comparison of the market integration approaches in Germany, Spain, and the UK , 2008 .

[13]  José Pablo Chaves-Ávila,et al.  Participation of wind power on the European balancing mechanisms , 2013, 2013 10th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[14]  A. N. Andersen,et al.  Market integration of wind power in electricity system balancing , 2013 .

[15]  Carmen Rodríguez-Morilla,et al.  Análisis de series temporales , 2000 .

[16]  Alexandra Purkus,et al.  Promoting the market and system integration of renewable energies through premium schemes—A case study of the German market premium , 2013 .

[17]  H. P. Williams,et al.  Model Building in Mathematical Programming , 1979 .