Correlated studies of a recombinant influenza-virus vaccine. 3. Protection against experimental influenza in man.

A recombinant (X-31) influenza A2 vaccine (Hong Kong variant) and a standard A2 vaccine (Hong Kong variant) were given to 51 normal adult volunteers. One month later, 29 vaccinated and 14 control volunteers were challenged with an infectious strain of the Hong Kong variant. The other 22 volunteers were given a second vaccination. All vaccinated volunteers developed a rise in neutralizing antibody in serum, and a minimal increase was noted from the second vaccination. Twenty-five of the 29 volunteers who were challenged with live virus showed a significant rise in neuraminidase-inhibiting (NI) antibody from vaccination. A rise in neutralizing antibody in nasal secretions was seen in 14 of 29, but only five subjects developed a rise in NI antibody. For each type of antibody in each location, the recombinant vaccine was slightly more antigenic, a finding compatible with the suggestion that it contained slightly more antigen (556 versus 503 chickcell-agglutinating units). After challenge with live virus, a reduction in frequency of infection and illness was noted in both vaccinated groups when compared to controls. Quantification of virus in specimens of nasal wash revealed an association between quantity of virus shed and clinical illness. Titers of NI antibody in serum correlated best with reduced shedding of virus, but an effect of neutralizing antibody could not be excluded. From the serologic responses to vaccination and the protection afforded against live-virus challenge, it was concluded that the recombinant vaccine was as effective as a standard A2 influenza vaccine.

[1]  E. D. Kilbourne,et al.  Correlated studies of a recombinant influenza-virus vaccine. II. Definition of antigenicity in experimental animals. , 1971, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  G. Schild,et al.  Related studies of a recombinant influenza-virus vaccine. I. Derivation and characterization of virus and vaccine. , 1971, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  F. M. Davenport,et al.  Antibody response to influenza virus enzyme in man. , 1970, Archives of Environmental Health An International Journal.

[4]  M. Sande,et al.  Antibody response in man to influenza virus neuraminidase following influenza , 1968, Journal of virology.

[5]  W. G. Laver,et al.  Identification in a recombinant influenza virus of structural proteins derived from both parents. , 1966, Virology.

[6]  R. Douglas,et al.  The role of nasal secretion and serum antibody in the rhinovirus common cold. , 1966, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  D. J. Finney Statistical Method in Biological Assay , 1966 .

[8]  R. Couch,et al.  Homologous and heterologous resistance to rhinovirus common cold. , 1965, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  A. Shelokov,et al.  Hemadsorption (Adsorption-Hemagglutination) Test for Viral Agents in Tissue Culture with Special Reference to Influenza , 1958, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[10]  R. Chanock,et al.  Newly recognized myxoviruses from children with respiratory disease. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Small,et al.  The Secretory Immunologic System , 1969 .

[12]  E. H. Lennette,et al.  Diagnostic procedures for viral and rickettsial infections , 1969 .

[13]  V. Knight THE USE OF VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY. , 1964, Progress in medical virology. Fortschritte der medizinischen Virusforschung. Progres en virologie medicale.