Pediatric and small female neck injury scale factors and tolerance based on human spine biomechanical characteristics

Existing neck scale factors to determine Injury Assessment Reference Values (IARV) for the pediatric one, three and six year old, and the 5th percentile female populations are based on extrapolations from the adult 50th percentile male and from the calcaneal tendon tensile strength data. The research question addressed in this study is: What are the scale factors and resulting neck tolerances for these age-specific populations if data from human spinal components and neck geometry are used? The analysis included the determination of scale factors under extension, tension, compression, and flexion loading modes as a function of age, namely one, three and six year old, and the 5th percentile female groups. Variations in the biomechanical properties of each spinal component were determined from human cadaver studies. Active spinal components were identified under each of the four loading modes and relationships were established for each component to obtain material-based scale factors. Combining material scaling with neck geometrical data yielded the scale factors for the three pediatric groups under all four loading modes. The age-dependent scale factors in extension, tension, compression, and flexion were respectively: 0.14, 0.25, 0.24, 0.14 for the one year old; 0.19, 0.30, 0.29, 0.18 for the three year old; and 0.25, 0.37, 0.36, 0.24 for the six year old. It appears that scale factors, and hence, resulting injury tolerance values based on spine component material properties, are more appropriate than the values extrapolated from the calcaneal tendon tensile test data. For the covering abstract of the conference see ITRD E206422.

[1]  Roger P. Daniel,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Head, Neck, and Torso Injuries to Child Surrogates Due to Sudden Torso Acceleration , 1984 .

[2]  Victor Braxton,et al.  Biomechanics of the central nervous system : some basic normal and pathologic phenomena , 1960 .

[3]  J. Galante Tensile properties of the human lumbar annulus fibrosus. , 1967, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  Frank A. Pintar,et al.  AGE-SPECIFIC PEDIATRIC CERVICAL SPINE BIOMECHANICAL RESPONSES: THREE-DIMENSIONAL NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT MODELS , 1997 .

[5]  C. V. van Kuijk Vertebral bone density in children: effect of puberty. , 1989, Radiology.

[6]  C. R. Bardeen Early development of the cervical vertebrae and the base of the occipital bone in man , 1908 .

[7]  H Tkaczuk,et al.  Tensile properties of human lumbar longitudinal ligaments. , 1968, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[9]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of cervical spine trauma. , 1991, Clinical neurosurgery.

[10]  A. Scher Trauma of the spinal cord in children. , 1976, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[11]  Srirangam Kumaresan,et al.  Biomechanical Assessment of Human Cervical Spine Ligaments , 1998 .

[12]  A. Sances,et al.  Tensile Strength of Spinal Ligaments , 1988, Spine.

[13]  Sherk The Cervical spine , 1983 .

[14]  F Holdsworth,et al.  Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. , 1963, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Effect of Age and Loading Rate on Human Cervical Spine Injury Threshold , 1998, Spine.

[16]  K. Hayashi,et al.  Origin of the uncus and of Luschka's joint in the cervical spine. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Some mechanical properties of the third human lumbar interlaminar ligament (ligamentum flavum). , 1968, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  Biomechanical Considerations for Child Occupant Protection , 1998 .

[19]  G Ray,et al.  Mathematical and finite element analysis of spine injuries. , 1987, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[20]  D. Bailey,et al.  The normal cervical spine in infants and children. , 1952, Radiology.

[21]  M Guillot,et al.  Biomechanical properties of spinal ligaments and a histological study of the supraspinal ligament in traction. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Injury Assessment Reference Values for the CRABI 6-Month Infant Dummy in a Rear-Facing Infant Restraint with Airbag Deployment , 1995 .

[23]  J. Bland,et al.  Luschka's Joint. , 1965 .

[24]  G. D. Driscoll,et al.  RESPONSES OF ANIMALS EXPOSED TO DEPLOYMENT OF VARIOUS PASSENGER INFLATABLE RESTRAINT SYSTEM CONCEPTS FOR A VARIETY OF COLLISION SEVERITIES AND ANIMAL POSITIONS. SAE PT-31, PASSENGER CAR INFLATABLE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS: A COMPENDIUM OF PUBLISHED SAFETY RESEARCH , 1982 .

[25]  C. V. van Kuijk,et al.  Vertebral bone density in children: effect of puberty. , 1989 .