When is the object relative clause easier to process than the subject relative clause? (思考と言語)

Subject relative clauses (SRCs) are processed more easily than object relative clauses (ORCs) in many languages. The present study aims to test the theories that have tried to explain why such an asymmetry exists in relative clause processing, focusing on the PDC approach (Gennari & MacDonald, 2008, 2009) that assumes that production, corpus distribution, and comprehension are closely related to each other. We conducted a gated sentence completion experiment and a self-paced reading experiment. Although the results do not show complete agreement between production and comprehension, the PDC approach captures many aspects of our results that is difficult to cover by other theories. Keyword Sentence processing,relative clause,self-paced reading task,gated sentence completion task

[1]  Sam Featherston,et al.  Empty Categories in Sentence Processing , 2001 .

[2]  John Hale,et al.  Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[4]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[5]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.

[6]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[7]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese , 2008 .

[8]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence , 2007 .

[9]  E. Gibson The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[10]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing , 2002 .

[11]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences. , 1981 .

[12]  Sakai Hiromu,et al.  Why object clefts are easier to process than subject clefts in Japanese -- Frequency or expectation? , 2011 .

[13]  Michiko Nakamura,et al.  Subject/Object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese , 2003 .

[14]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  John Hale,et al.  The Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.