Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist's perspective

Summary The final yield of a crop is the product of growth during the growing season and a number of developmental processes occurring throughout the life cycle of a crop, with most genes influencing the final outcome to a degree. However, recent advances in molecular biology have developed the potential to identify and map many genes or QTLs related to various important traits, including yield, plant adaptation and tolerance to stresses. Significant G×E interactions for yield have been identified, as have interactions associated with QTLs for yield. However, there is little evidence available to confirm that a QTL for yield from a parental line in one mapping population may improve yield when transferred into an adapted, high-yielding line of another population. In order to narrow the apparent gap between the genotype and the phenotype with regard to yield, it is important to identify key traits related to yield and then attempt to identify and locate the genes controlling them. The partitioning of the developmental time to anthesis into different phases: from sowing to the onset of stem elongation and from then to anthesis, as a relatively simple physiological attribute putatively related to yield, is discussed. If the relationship holds in a wider range of conditions and the genetic factors responsible are located then the genetic basis of yield should be identified. There has also been significant progress in crop simulation modelling. Using knowledge of crop physiology and empirical relationships these models can simulate the performance of crops, including the G×E interactions. Such models require information regarding the genetic basis of yield, which are included in the form of genetic coefficients. Essentially models are constructed as decision-making tools for management but may be of use in detecting prospective traits for selection within a breeding programme. Problems associated with this approach are discussed. This review discusses the need to use crop physiology approaches to analyse components of yield in order to reliably identify the genetic basis of yield.

[1]  G. Slafer,et al.  Source—sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat , 1994 .

[2]  G. Slafer,et al.  Changes in physiological attributes of the dry matter economy of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) through genetic improvement of grain yield potential at different regions of the world , 1991, Euphytica.

[3]  R. Belford,et al.  Growth, development and light interception of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment , 1989 .

[4]  G. Slafer,et al.  Genetic improvement in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield in Argentina , 1989 .

[5]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research , 1996 .

[6]  Matthew P. Reynolds,et al.  Application of physiology in wheat breeding , 2001 .

[7]  H. Rawson,et al.  Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors: a re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modellers , 1994 .

[8]  G. Slafer,et al.  Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinian wheat cultivar , 1991, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[9]  G. Slafer,et al.  Contrasting Ppd alleles in wheat: effects on sensitivity to photoperiod in different phases , 2002 .

[10]  G. Slafer,et al.  Grain weight in wheat cultivars released from 1920 to 1990 as affected by post-anthesis defoliation , 1997, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[11]  J. Morgan.  Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat , 1983 .

[12]  H. Berge,et al.  Simulating genotypic strategies for increasing rice yield potential in irrigated, tropical environments , 1997 .

[13]  G. Slafer,et al.  Physiological attributes related to the generation of grain yield in bread wheat cultivars released at different eras , 1993 .

[14]  K. Boote,et al.  Physiology and modelling of traits in crop plants: implications for genetic improvement , 2001 .

[15]  J. Lilley,et al.  Locating QTL for osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance in rice , 1996 .

[16]  Matthew P. Reynolds,et al.  Physiological and Genetic Changes of Irrigated Wheat in the Post–Green Revolution Period and Approaches for Meeting Projected Global Demand , 1999 .

[17]  G. Slafer,et al.  Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats , 2003 .

[18]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Assessing strategies for wheat cropping in the monsoonal climate of the Pampas using the CERES-Wheat simulation model , 1995 .

[19]  Drought and drought tolerance , 1996 .

[20]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. , 2000 .

[21]  K. Siddique,et al.  Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increases in Mediterranean environments , 1994 .

[22]  A. Medhurst,et al.  Transgenic wheat plants: a powerful breeding source , 2001, Euphytica.

[23]  J. Passioura,et al.  Review: Environmental biology and crop improvement. , 2002, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[24]  J. Jensen,et al.  Quantitative trait loci for grain yield and yield components in a cross between a six-rowed and a two-rowed barley , 2004, Euphytica.

[25]  S. Ullrich,et al.  Molecular breeding for grain yield in barley: an evaluation of QTL effects in a spring barley cross , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[26]  J. Snape,et al.  Mapping genes for flowering time and frost tolerance in cereals using precise genetic stocks , 2004, Euphytica.

[27]  R. Richards,et al.  Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought , 1996, Plant Growth Regulation.

[28]  M. Tan,et al.  Chromosomal Location of a Wheat Osmoregulation Gene Using RFLP Analysis , 1996 .

[29]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  A simulation analysis that predicts the influence of physiological traits on the potential yield of wheat , 2002 .

[30]  M. Khairallah,et al.  Several QTLs involved in osmotic-adjustment trait variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[31]  K. Devos,et al.  Comparative genetics in the grasses , 1997, Plant Molecular Biology.

[32]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Improving Genotypic Adaptation in Crops – a Role for Breeders, Physiologists and Modellers , 1991, Experimental Agriculture.

[33]  J. R. Ritchie,et al.  Description and performance of CERES-Wheat: a user-oriented wheat yield model , 1985 .

[34]  G. Slafer,et al.  Individual grain weight responses to genetic reduction in culm length in wheat as affected by source-sink manipulations , 1995 .

[35]  E. Kirby.  Analysis of leaf, stem and ear growth in wheat from terminal spikelet stage to anthesis. , 1988 .

[36]  M. Reynolds,et al.  Avenues for genetic modification of radiation use efficiency in wheat. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[37]  Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought , 1996 .

[38]  C. Sneller,et al.  Evaluation of Marker‐Assisted Introgression of Yield QTL Alleles into Adapted Soybean , 2001 .

[39]  G. Slafer,et al.  Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height , 1998 .

[40]  S. Chapman,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. I. Characteristics that confound interpretation of hybrid yield , 2000 .

[41]  D. Tennant,et al.  Water Use and Water Use Efficiency of Old and Modern Wheat Cultivars in a Mediterranean-type Environment , 1990 .

[42]  M. J. Kropff,et al.  AFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci for yield-determining physiological characters in spring barley , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[43]  I. Romagosa,et al.  Verification of yield QTL through realized molecular marker- assisted selection responses in a barley cross , 1999, Molecular Breeding.

[44]  M. Polacco,et al.  Synergy of Empirical Breeding, Marker‐Assisted Selection, and Genomics to Increase Crop Yield Potential , 1999 .

[45]  F. Salisbury.  Responses to Photoperiod , 1981 .

[46]  R. Appels,et al.  Diagnostic DNA markers for cereal cyst nematode resistance in bread wheat , 2001 .

[47]  J. Araus,et al.  Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? , 2002, Annals of botany.

[48]  K. Chase,et al.  Genetics of Soybean Agronomic Traits: II. Interactions between Yield Quantitative Trait Loci in Soybean , 1999 .

[49]  G. Slafer,et al.  RESPONSES TO PHOTOPERIOD CHANGE WITH PHENOPHASE AND TEMPERATURE DURING WHEAT DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[50]  L. Kochian,et al.  Identification of RFLP Markers Linked to the Barley Aluminum Tolerance Gene Alp , 2000 .

[51]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature , 1985, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[52]  J. Snape.  Golden calves or white elephants? Biotechnologies for wheat improvement , 2004, Euphytica.

[53]  Patrick M. Hayes,et al.  Use of the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model in QTL mapping for adaptation in barley , 1996, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[54]  K. Devos,et al.  Comparative genetics in the grasses. , 1998, Plant molecular biology.

[55]  R. Richards.  Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[56]  A. Hall,et al.  Osmotic adjustment and yield maintenance under drought in sunflower , 2002 .

[57]  J. Passioura.  Drought and drought tolerance , 1996, Plant Growth Regulation.

[58]  I. Romagosa,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: basic concepts and methods of analysis , 2002 .

[59]  J. Morgan.  A gene controlling differences in osmoregulation in wheat , 1991 .

[60]  J. Snape,et al.  Waiting for Fine Times: Genetics of Flowering Time in Wheat , 2001 .

[61]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Genetic analysis of osmotic adjustment in crop plants , 1999 .

[62]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. , 1990 .

[63]  G. Slafer,et al.  Increases in Grain Yieid in Bread Wheat from Breeding and Associated Physiological Changes , 1994 .

[64]  M. Saltveit,et al.  Physiological Attributes Related to Quality Attributes and Storage Life of Minimally Processed Lettuce , 1993 .

[65]  P. Langridge,et al.  RFLP mapping of manganese efficiency in barley , 2000, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[66]  L. T. Evans,et al.  Feeding the Ten Billion: Plants and Population Growth , 1999 .

[67]  G. Slafer,et al.  Responses to photoperiod before and after jointing in wheat substitution lines , 2001, Euphytica.

[68]  D. This,et al.  New QTLs identified for plant water status, water-soluble carbohydrate and osmotic adjustment in a barley population grown in a growth-chamber under two water regimes , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[69]  Evans Lt,et al.  Yield potential: its definition, measurement, and significance , 2000 .

[70]  H. C. Harris,et al.  Assessing the productivity of wheat genotypes in a Mediterranean climate, using a crop-simulation model , 1989 .

[71]  R. B. Austin.  Yield of Wheat in the United Kingdom: Recent Advances and Prospects , 1999 .

[72]  R. Flood,et al.  Variation in duration of pre-anthesis phases of development in barley (Hordeum vulgare) , 1996 .

[73]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Durum wheat and barley yields in antiquity estimated from 13C discrimination of archaeological grains: a case study from the Western Mediterranean Basin , 1999 .

[74]  Donald N. Duvick,et al.  Feeding the Ten Billion: Plants and Population Growth , 1999 .