Model predictive control of induction motor drives: Flux control versus torque control

Recently, model predictive torque control (MPTC) has been introduced as a powerful control method for induction motor (IM) drives. However, the weighting factor for stator flux must be tuned carefully to obtain satisfactory performance at different operation points. Unfortunately, so far the tuning of weighting factor in MPTC is mostly based on empirical procedure. This paper solves this problem by proposing a model predictive flux control (MPFC), which uses the stator flux vector as the control variable. As a result, the weighting factor in conventional MPTC is eliminated and the control complexity is significantly reduced. Both MPTC and MPFC are tested and compared in detail, including steady state performance, dynamic response and low speed operation. The experimental results prove that, the performance of conventional MPTC is dependent on the weighting factor and improper weighting factor would lead to significant performance deterioration. On the contrary, the proposed MPFC achieves similar or even better overall performance over a wide speed range with very low tuning work. Hence, it is concluded that the proposed MPFC is more practical than conventional MPTC.

[1]  Yongchang Zhang,et al.  Generalized Two-Vector-Based Model-Predictive Torque Control of Induction Motor Drives , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[2]  José R. Espinoza,et al.  Predictive Torque and Flux Control Without Weighting Factors , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Patricio Cortes,et al.  Predictive Control of Power Converters and Electrical Drives: Rodriguez/Predictive Control of Power Converters and Electrical Drives , 2012 .

[4]  R. Kennel,et al.  Using a weighting factor table for FCS-MPC of induction motors with extended prediction horizon , 2012, IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[5]  José R. Rodríguez,et al.  Predictive Current Control of an Induction Machine Fed by a Matrix Converter With Reactive Power Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  R. Kennel,et al.  An Improved FCS–MPC Algorithm for an Induction Motor With an Imposed Optimized Weighting Factor , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[7]  Yongchang Zhang,et al.  Torque ripple reduction of model predictive torque control of induction motor drives , 2013, 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition.

[8]  Leopoldo G. Franquelo,et al.  Guidelines for weighting factors design in Model Predictive Control of power converters and drives , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology.

[9]  José R. Espinoza,et al.  Multiobjective Switching State Selector for Finite-States Model Predictive Control Based on Fuzzy Decision Making in a Matrix Converter , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Ralph Kennel,et al.  High-Performance Control Strategies for Electrical Drives: An Experimental Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  José R. Rodríguez,et al.  Predictive Torque Control of Induction Machines Based on State-Space Models , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Torque Control—Part I: Concept, Algorithm, and Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Yongchang Zhang,et al.  Model Predictive Torque Control of Induction Motor Drives With Optimal Duty Cycle Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[14]  Petros Karamanakos,et al.  Variable Switching Point Predictive Torque Control of Induction Machines , 2014, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics.

[15]  Wei Xu,et al.  An Improved Direct Torque Control for Three-Level Inverter-Fed Induction Motor Sensorless Drive , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.