Temporal Characteristics of Radiologists' and Novices' Lesion Detection in Viewing Medical Images Presented Rapidly and Sequentially

Although viewing multiple stacks of medical images presented on a display is a relatively new but useful medical task, little is known about this task. Particularly, it is unclear how radiologists search for lesions in this type of image reading. When viewing cluttered and dynamic displays, continuous motion itself does not capture attention. Thus, it is effective for the target detection that observers' attention is captured by the onset signal of a suddenly appearing target among the continuously moving distractors (i.e., a passive viewing strategy). This can be applied to stack viewing tasks, because lesions often show up as transient signals in medical images which are sequentially presented simulating a dynamic and smoothly transforming image progression of organs. However, it is unclear whether observers can detect a target when the target appears at the beginning of a sequential presentation where the global apparent motion onset signal (i.e., signal of the initiation of the apparent motion by sequential presentation) occurs. We investigated the ability of radiologists to detect lesions during such tasks by comparing the performances of radiologists and novices. Results show that overall performance of radiologists is better than novices. Furthermore, the temporal locations of lesions in CT image sequences, i.e., when a lesion appears in an image sequence, does not affect the performance of radiologists, whereas it does affect the performance of novices. Results indicate that novices have greater difficulty in detecting a lesion appearing early than late in the image sequence. We suggest that radiologists have other mechanisms to detect lesions in medical images with little attention which novices do not have. This ability is critically important when viewing rapid sequential presentations of multiple CT images, such as stack viewing tasks.

[1]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Trafton Drew,et al.  Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[3]  M. Loeb,et al.  The Psychology of Vigilance , 1982 .

[4]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Elizabeth A Krupinski,et al.  Current perspectives in medical image perception , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  B Tversky,et al.  Picture memory improves with longer on time and off time. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[7]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[8]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  V. Roggli,et al.  Solitary pulmonary nodules: Part I. Morphologic evaluation for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  H L Kundel,et al.  Finding lung nodules with and without comparative visual scanning , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Does visual expertise improve visual recognition memory? , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[13]  H. Intraub Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. , 1981 .

[14]  Michiteru Kitazaki,et al.  Attentional capture by the onset and offset of motion signals outside the spatial focus of attention. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[15]  Karla K. Evans,et al.  The gist of the abnormal: Above-chance medical decision making in the blink of an eye , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[16]  W. Boot,et al.  Age-related differences in visual search in dynamic displays. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[17]  H L Kundel,et al.  Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. , 1975, Radiology.

[18]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[20]  Hany Farid,et al.  The specificity of the search template. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[21]  B. Julesz,et al.  Fast noninertial shifts of attention. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[22]  Kazuhiko Yokosawa,et al.  Attentional awakening: gradual modulation of temporal attention in rapid serial visual presentation , 2008, Psychological research.

[23]  Kazuhiko Yokosawa,et al.  Visual search in divided areas: Dividers initially interfere with and later facilitate visual search , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  D. Hansell,et al.  Thin-section CT of the lungs: eye-tracking analysis of the visual approach to reading tiled and stacked display formats. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[25]  M. Potter,et al.  Time to understand pictures and words , 1975, Nature.

[26]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  P. Perona,et al.  Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli , 2005 .

[28]  D Gur,et al.  Sequential viewing of abdominal CT images at varying rates. , 1994, Radiology.

[29]  Walter R. Boot,et al.  Detecting Transient Changes in Dynamic Displays: The More You Look, the Less You See , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Kazuhiko Yokosawa,et al.  The effect of expert knowledge on medical search: medical experts have specialized abilities for detecting serious lesions , 2014, Psychological Research.

[31]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual search in a multi-element asynchronous dynamic (MAD) world. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Harold L Kundel,et al.  History of research in medical image perception. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[33]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  H L Kundel,et al.  Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. , 1978, Investigative radiology.

[35]  J W Oestmann,et al.  Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection. , 1988, Radiology.

[36]  T. Crawford,et al.  Time-dependent observer errors in pulmonary nodule detection. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[37]  Kazuhiko Yokosawa,et al.  Experimental system for measurement of radiologists’ performance by visual search task , 2013, SpringerPlus.

[38]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Natural-Scene Perception Requires Attention , 2011, Psychological science.

[39]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[40]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[41]  Diana Hardmeier,et al.  Aviation Security Screeners Visual Abilities & Visual Knowledge Measurement , 2005 .

[42]  K. Yokosawa,et al.  PROOFREADERS SHOW A GENERALIZED ABILITY TO ALLOCATE SPATIAL ATTENTION TO DETECT CHANGES , 2008 .

[43]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Attentional blink , 2009, Scholarpedia.

[44]  R. Abrams,et al.  Motion Onset Captures Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[45]  Kazuhiko Yokosawa,et al.  Visual Search of Experts in Medical Image Reading: The Effect of Training, Target Prevalence, and Expert Knowledge , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[46]  P. Perona,et al.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[48]  Gregg T. Vesonder,et al.  Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals , 1980 .

[49]  G. Loftus,et al.  Differential Acquisition Rates for Different Types of Information from Pictures , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[50]  Katherine P Andriole,et al.  Optimizing analysis, visualization, and navigation of large image data sets: one 5000-section CT scan can ruin your whole day. , 2011, Radiology.

[51]  BELA JULESZ,et al.  Rapid discrimination of visual patterns , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[52]  C J Harvey,et al.  Observer accuracy in the detection of pulmonary nodules on CT: effect of cine frame rate. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[53]  S. M. Luria,et al.  Eye movements during search for coded and uncoded targets , 1975 .

[54]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  M. Kawato,et al.  The mechanism of mental scanning in foveal vision , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[56]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[57]  D. Sagi,et al.  Vision outside the focus of attention , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Training of efficient oculomotor strategies enhances skill acquisition. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[59]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists' error rates in screening for cervical cancer. , 2011, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[60]  Michael C Hout,et al.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[61]  H L Kundel,et al.  Searching for lung nodules. The guidance of visual scanning. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[62]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[63]  Cornelia Kranczioch,et al.  Attentional awakening, resource allocation and the focus of temporal attention , 2011, Neuroreport.

[64]  Hironobu Nakamura,et al.  Pulmonary Cavitary Nodules on Computed Tomography: Differentiation of Malignancy and Benignancy , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[65]  R. Abrams,et al.  The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003) , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  R. Klein,et al.  Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? , 1995, Memory & cognition.