Perceived speed differences explain apparent compression in slit viewing

When a figure moves behind a stationary narrow slit, observers often report seeing the figure as an integrated whole, a phenomenon known as slit viewing or anorthoscopic perception. Interestingly, in slit viewing, the figure is perceived compressed along the axis of motion, e.g., a circle is perceived as an ellipse. Underestimation of the speed of the moving object was offered as an explanation for this apparent compression. We measured perceived speed and compression in anorthoscopic perception and found results that are inconsistent with this hypothesis. We found evidence for an alternative hypothesis according to which apparent compression results from perceived speed differences between different parts of the figure, viz., the trailing parts are perceived to move faster than the leading parts. These differences in the perceived speeds of the trailing and the leading edges may be due to differences in the visibilities of the leading and trailing parts. We discuss our findings within a non-retinotopic framework of form analysis for moving objects.

[1]  I Rock,et al.  Form perception without a retinal image. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  W. Epstein,et al.  Two factors in the perception of velocity at a distance , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Talis Bachmann Psychophysiology of Visual Masking: The Fine Structure of Conscious Experience , 1994 .

[4]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[5]  Thomas U. Otto,et al.  The flight path of the phoenix--the visible trace of invisible elements in human vision. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[6]  G A Orban,et al.  What is the Speed of Transparent and Kinetic-Boundary Displays? , 1999, Perception.

[7]  K. Jellinger Visual Masking – Time Slices through Conscious and Unconscious Vision, 2nd edn. , 2009 .

[8]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[10]  P. Thompson,et al.  Human speed perception is contrast dependent , 1992, Vision Research.

[11]  C Casco,et al.  The Relationship between Space and Time in the Perception of Stimuli Moving behind a Slit , 1984, Perception.

[12]  I Rock,et al.  Anorthoscopic perception. , 1981, Scientific American.

[13]  N. Fujita Three-Dimensional Anorthoscopic Perception , 1990, Perception.

[14]  I Rock,et al.  Eye movement as a cue to figure motion in anorthoscopic perception. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  F. Zöllner,et al.  Ueber eine neue Art anorthoskopischer Zerrbilder , 1862 .

[16]  T. Sohmiya,et al.  What is a crucial determinant in anorthoscopic perception? , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  T. Sohmiya,et al.  Where Does an Anorthoscopic Image Appear? , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[18]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  The appearance of figures seen through a narrow aperture under free viewing conditions: effects of spontaneous eye motions. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[19]  W C Gogel,et al.  Perceived velocity as a function of reference mark density. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[20]  Simon J. Bennett,et al.  Combined smooth and saccadic ocular pursuit during the transient occlusion of a moving visual object , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  W Richards,et al.  “Seeing” shapes that are almost totally occluded: A new look at Parks’s camel , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Semir Zeki,et al.  Perceptual compression of space through position integration , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Edgar Rubin Kritisches und Experimentelles zur „Empfindungszeit“ Fröhlichs , 1930 .

[24]  Mark Edwards,et al.  Effect of signal intensity on perceived speed , 2006, Vision Research.

[25]  J. F. Brown The visual perception of velocity , 1931 .

[26]  P. Thompson Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast , 1982, Vision Research.

[27]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Nick Fogt,et al.  A novel automated method for marking catch-up saccades , 2010 .

[29]  Philip J. Kellman,et al.  Underestimation of velocity after occlusion causes the aperture-capture illusion , 2010 .

[30]  Haluk Oğmen,et al.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations. , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[31]  Stephen T. Hammett,et al.  Speed can go up as well as down at low contrast: Implications for models of motion perception , 2006, Vision Research.

[32]  S. Nishida Motion-Based Analysis of Spatial Patterns by the Human Visual System , 2004, Current Biology.

[33]  Haluk Öğmen,et al.  Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision , 2006, Vision Research.

[34]  J H Hogben,et al.  Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[35]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Post-retinal storage? Some further observations on Parks’ camel as seen through the eye of a needle , 1968 .

[36]  Simon J Bennett,et al.  Predictive smooth ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of a visual target. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  P. Hammond,et al.  Hemifield Differences in Perceived Velocity , 1986, Perception.

[38]  S Anstis,et al.  Footsteps and Inchworms: Illusions Show That Contrast Affects Apparent Speed , 2001, Perception.

[39]  J M Findlay,et al.  Aperture Viewing*: A Review and a Synthesis , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  E. Switkes,et al.  Deoxyglucose analysis of retinotopic organization in primate striate cortex. , 1982, Science.

[41]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  The effect of retinal stabilization on anorthoscopic percepts under free-viewing conditions , 2005, Vision Research.

[43]  I. Rock,et al.  Intelligence Factors in the Perception of Form through a Moving Slit , 1973, Perception.

[44]  Friedrich W. Fröhlich,et al.  Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1930 .

[45]  W. Metzger,et al.  Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1932 .

[46]  S. Anstis,et al.  Distortions in moving figures viewed through a stationary slit. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[47]  J. Zanker,et al.  What determines the perceived speed of dots moving within apertures? , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Haluk Öğmen,et al.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations , 2008, Advances in Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  M. Hawken,et al.  Perceived velocity of luminance, chromatic and non-fourier stimuli: Influence of contrast and temporal frequency , 1996, Vision Research.

[51]  R. Snowden,et al.  The Effect of Contrast upon Perceived Speed: A General Phenomenon? , 1999, Perception.

[52]  M J Watkins,et al.  The seeing-more-than-is-there phenomenon: implications for the locus of iconic storage. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  R. Snowden,et al.  Speed perception fogs up as visibility drops , 1998, Nature.

[54]  T. Parks POST-RETINAL VISUAL STORAGE. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[55]  Philip J. Kellman,et al.  The aperture capture effect: Misperceived forms in dynamic occlusion displays , 2010 .

[56]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Factors affecting footsteps: contrast can change the apparent speed, amplitude and direction of motion , 2004, Vision Research.

[57]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[58]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .