The most conspicuous modality difference between signed and spoken languages is the fact that in signing the two hands are used as primary articulators. The resulting potential for more simultaneous expression of information has intrigued researchers since the early days of sign linguistics, even though little empirical research has been done until recently (see Vermeerbergen, Leeson, and Crasborn 2007 for an overview). Examples of manual simultaneity have been described for several sign languages and at various levels of linguistic structure (prosody, syntax, discourse). While previous studies have described and analyzed a number of structures that exploit manual simultaneity, large-scale corpus-based analyses of the actual use of these phenomena are yet to be conducted. Studies aiming to provide grammatical description and analysis may rely on prototypical examples of the structures in question, but the corpus linguist deals with language use “in the wild” and has to identify and understand all instances of the phenomenon under investigation. The annotation process is crucial in any corpus-based approach (Aarts 2002) and clear annotation guidelines are indispensable for reliable and comprehensive data selection in the study of a given structure. The purpose of this paper is to describe a corpus-based approach to the study of manual simultaneity (in particular manual holds) and our first attempt at implementing it for the Sign Language of the Netherlands (Nederlandse Gebarentaal, NGT). After discussing previous research on the subject and the new insights we expect from a corpus-based analysis, we present our annotation guidelines and evaluate them based on a pilot study on the Corpus NGT.
[1]
Onno Crasborn,et al.
The Other Hand in Sign Language Phonology
,
2011
.
[2]
Trevor Johnston,et al.
From archive to corpus: transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora
,
2008,
PACLIC.
[3]
Myriam Vermeerbergen,et al.
Simultaneity in signed languages: a string of sequentially organised issues
,
2007
.
[4]
J.M.G.A. Aarts,et al.
Does corpus linguistics exist? Some old and new issues
,
2002
.
[5]
Scott K. Liddell,et al.
A crosslinguistic comparison of buoys : Evidence from American, Norwegian, and Swedish Sign Language
,
2007
.
[6]
Wendy Sandler,et al.
Phonology , phonetics and the nondominant hand
,
2005
.
[7]
Brita Bergman,et al.
Point Buoys : The Weak Hand as a Point of Reference for Time and Space
,
2007
.
[8]
Lynn A. Friedman,et al.
Space, Time, and Person Reference in American Sign Language.
,
1975
.
[9]
Onno Crasborn,et al.
A linguistic analysis of the use of the two hands in sign language poetry
,
2006
.
[10]
Donna Jo Napoli,et al.
Limitations on simultaneity in sign language
,
2010
.