Triple-negative breast cancer: what the radiologist needs to know.

Approximately 10% to 15% of breast carcinomas do not express estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) and do not exhibit overexpression or gene amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). These tumors are called triple receptor-negative or triple-negative (TN) breast cancers. TN breast cancer has recently been recognized as a subtype of breast cancer with aggressive clinical behaviorandapoorclinicaloutcome.TNbreastcancershave a propensity to occur in premenopausal women and Hispanic and African-American women, and TN tumors are associated with mutations in p53 and BRCA1. Therapies targeting the estrogen receptor or the HER2/neu oncogene are likelytobeineffectiveagainstTNtumors.Thisarticlereviews the molecular, pathologic, and imaging features of TN breast cancer. Breastcancersareagroupofdiseaseswithawidespectrum of clinical, pathologic, and molecular characteristics. By the use of gene expression profiles, 4 breast cancer subtypes with different prognoses have been identified: 2 ER-negative subtypes: basal-like (BL) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, and 2 ER-positive subtypes: luminal A and luminal B. 1-4 Breast cancers are classified as TN by the use of established immunohistochemical (IHC) assays for ER, PR, and HER2, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for HER2. TN breast cancers are characterized bytheabsenceofall3predictive/prognosticmarkers:ER,PR, and HER2. Most TN breast cancers are high grade, and the tumors are usually large with relatively well-circumscribed pushing margins, lymphocytic infiltration and a high mitotic rate. 5,6 BL breast cancer is a molecular phenotype defined on the basis of cDNA microarray studies. 7 Approximately 70% of TN breast cancers are BL tumors. 1,8-12 The term BL comes from the resemblance between the cytokeratin expression pattern in the cancer cells and the myoepithelial cells of the breast. 9,13,14 ThisdoesnotmeanthatBLbreastcancercellsare derived from myoepithelial cells. Despite the great interest in BL and TN cancers, there are no universally accepted definitions for these tumors. In this review, we use the term BL when cDNA or more sophisticated technology was applied for tumor classification and TN when clinical assays for ER, PR, and HER2 were used.

[1]  M. Smith,et al.  Visualization of FISH Probes by Dual-Color Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization , 2011 .

[2]  K. Nakagawa,et al.  Early distant relapse in early stage triple-negative breast cancer: usefulness of FDG-PET for diagnosis of distant metastases , 2013, Breast Cancer.

[3]  Jorge S Reis-Filho,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  W. Woodward,et al.  Clinically apparent internal mammary nodal metastasis in patients with advanced breast cancer: incidence and local control. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  W. Yang,et al.  Multimodality imaging of triple receptor-negative tumors with mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  J. T. Jørgensen,et al.  Visualization of FISH Probes by dual-color chromogenic in situ hybridization. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  A. Alavi,et al.  Degree of Tumor FDG Uptake Correlates with Proliferation Index in Triple Negative Breast Cancer , 2010, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[8]  Eun Sook Ko,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between imaging and pathological findings , 2010, European Radiology.

[9]  S. Krishnamurthy Current applications and future prospects of fine‐needle aspiration biopsy of locoregional lymph nodes in the management of breast cancer , 2009, Cancer.

[10]  D. Ravichandran,et al.  Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology of the axilla in the pre-operative identification of axillary nodal involvement in breast cancer. , 2009, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  G. Whitman,et al.  Workup and staging of locally advanced breast cancer. , 2009, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[12]  F. Esteva,et al.  Survival among women with triple receptor-negative breast cancer and brain metastases. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  I. Ellis,et al.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Distinguishing between Basal and Nonbasal Subtypes , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  T. Uematsu,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings. , 2009, Radiology.

[15]  Tianyu Li,et al.  Locoregional recurrence of triple‐negative breast cancer after breast‐conserving surgery and radiation , 2009, Cancer.

[16]  Jeff Myers,et al.  Survival outcomes for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: implications for clinical practice and trial design. , 2009, Clinical breast cancer.

[17]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Is There a Difference in the Association between Percent Mammographic Density and Subtypes of Breast Cancer? Luminal A and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[18]  B. Haffty Locoregional Recurrence of Triple-negative Breast Cancer After Breast-conserving Surgery and Radiation , 2009 .

[19]  T. Lash,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancers are increased in black women regardless of age or body mass index , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[20]  Lisa A Carey,et al.  Understanding and treating triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Oncology.

[21]  Daniel Birnbaum,et al.  How basal are triple‐negative breast cancers? , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[22]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  John W M Martens,et al.  Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse. , 2008, Cancer research.

[24]  A. Gown Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[25]  K. Hess,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Samuel Leung,et al.  Basal-Like Breast Cancer Defined by Five Biomarkers Has Superior Prognostic Value than Triple-Negative Phenotype , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  A. Alavi,et al.  Comparison of triple‐negative and estrogen receptor‐positive/progesterone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters , 2008, Cancer.

[28]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Mammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal women , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[29]  C. Perou,et al.  Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[30]  C. Perou,et al.  Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[31]  O. Nalcioglu,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in predicting pathological response of triple negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Jinsong Liu,et al.  Assessment of Two Automated Imaging Systems in Evaluating Estrogen Receptor Status in Breast Carcinoma , 2007, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[33]  O Nalcioglu,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer: MRI features in 29 patients. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  S. Narod,et al.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[35]  Marc Tischkowitz,et al.  Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer , 2007, BMC Cancer.

[36]  L. Huo HER2 Testing by Local, Central, and Reference Laboratories in Specimens From the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial , 2007 .

[37]  A. Ashworth,et al.  BRCA1 dysfunction in sporadic basal-like breast cancer , 2007, Oncogene.

[38]  D. Vanel The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[39]  I. Ellis,et al.  The reliability of assessment of oestrogen receptor expression on needle core biopsy specimens of invasive carcinomas of the breast , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[40]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[41]  Karen A Gelmon,et al.  Immunohistochemical detection using the new rabbit monoclonal antibody SP1 of estrogen receptor in breast cancer is superior to mouse monoclonal antibody 1D5 in predicting survival. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  K. Altundağ Primary breast cancer phenotypes associated with propensity for central nervous system metastases , 2006, Cancer.

[43]  C. Perou,et al.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. , 2006, JAMA.

[44]  R. Gelber,et al.  Identifying breast cancer patients at risk for Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases in trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[45]  C. Perou,et al.  Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma , 2006, Modern Pathology.

[46]  C. Caldas,et al.  Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative Chemotherapy , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[48]  L. Newman,et al.  Comprehensive Axillary Evaluation in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Patients With Ultrasonography and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , 2005, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[49]  T. Sawada,et al.  [Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR)]. , 2005, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[50]  W. Böcker,et al.  An immunohistochemical study of the breast using antibodies to basal and luminal keratins, alpha-smooth muscle actin, vimentin, collagen IV and laminin , 1992, Virchows Archiv A.

[51]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Estrogen receptor-negative breast carcinomas: a review of morphology and immunophenotypical analysis , 2005, Modern Pathology.

[52]  Therese Sørlie,et al.  Molecular portraits of breast cancer: tumour subtypes as distinct disease entities. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[53]  D. Allred,et al.  Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in breast cancer: a validation study , 2004, Modern Pathology.

[54]  P. Johnston,et al.  The role of BRCA1 in the cellular response to chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[55]  A. Gown,et al.  Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[56]  M. Untch,et al.  Her-2/neu gene amplification and response to paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[57]  C. Perou,et al.  "Intrinsic Gene Expression" subtypes correlated with grade and morphometric parameters reveal a high proportion of aggressive basal-like tumors among black women of African ancestry. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  William D. Foulkes,et al.  Re: Germline BRCA1 Mutations and a Basal Epithelial Phenotype in Breast Cancer , 2004 .

[59]  N. Sneige Utility of cytologic specimens in the evaluation of prognostic and predictive factors of breast cancer: Current issues and future directions , 2004, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[60]  L. Bégin,et al.  The Prognostic Implication of the Basal-Like (Cyclin Ehigh/p27low/p53+/Glomeruloid-Microvascular-Proliferation+) Phenotype of BRCA1-Related Breast Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[61]  R. Elledge,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of p53 and p21 in breast cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[62]  L. Bégin,et al.  Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[63]  L. Bégin,et al.  Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation is associated with p53 expression, germline BRCA1 mutations and an adverse outcome following breast cancer , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[64]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  L. Skoog,et al.  Hormone receptor status in breast cancer – a comparison between surgical specimens and fine needle aspiration biopsies , 2003, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[66]  L. Layfield,et al.  Interlaboratory Variation in Results from Immunohistochemical Assessment of Estrogen Receptor Status , 2003, The breast journal.

[67]  L. Belghiti,et al.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2002 .

[68]  Peter A Kaufman,et al.  Concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing in the breast intergroup trial N9831. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[69]  Greg Yothers,et al.  Real-world performance of HER2 testing--National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[70]  S. Gutman Regulatory issues in tumor marker development. , 2002, Seminars in oncology.

[71]  D. Arber Effect of Prolonged Formalin Fixation on the Immunohistochemical Reactivity of Breast Markers , 2002, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[72]  D. DeMets,et al.  Oophorectomy and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy in premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese women with operable breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[73]  A. Douglas-Jones,et al.  The effect of fixation and processing on the sensitivity of oestrogen receptor assay by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma. , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[74]  R. Gelber,et al.  Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[75]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[76]  J. McCann Better assays needed for hormone receptor status, experts say. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[77]  L. Bobrow,et al.  Study of interlaboratory reliability and reproducibility of estrogen and progesterone receptor assays in Europe. Documentation of poor reliability and identification of insufficient microwave antigen retrieval time as a major contributory element of unreliable assays. , 2001, American journal of clinical pathology.

[78]  D. Slamon,et al.  Assessment of methods for tissue-based detection of the HER-2/neu alteration in human breast cancer: a direct comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[79]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[80]  S. Edge,et al.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2005 .

[81]  S. Martino,et al.  Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), by ligand‐binding assay compared with ER, PgR and pS2, by immuno‐histochemistry in predicting response to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group study , 2000, International journal of cancer.

[82]  D. Visscher,et al.  Determination of Her-2/Neu Status in Breast Carcinoma: Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization , 2000, Modern Pathology.

[83]  N. Robert,et al.  Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[84]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[85]  M. Fernö,et al.  Correlation between p53, c‐erbB‐2, and topoisomerase IIα expression, DNA ploidy, hormonal receptor status and proliferation in 356 node‐negative breast carcinomas: prognostic implications , 1999, The Journal of pathology.

[86]  D. Allred,et al.  Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. , 1998, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[87]  B. Angus,et al.  New monoclonal antibodies to oestrogen and progesterone receptors effective for paraffin section immunohistochemistry , 1997, The Journal of pathology.

[88]  D. Barnes,et al.  Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[89]  R. Gelber,et al.  Meeting highlights: international consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[90]  D. Slamon,et al.  Sensitivity of HER-2/neu antibodies in archival tissue samples: potential source of error in immunohistochemical studies of oncogene expression. , 1994, Cancer research.

[91]  S Masood,et al.  Estrogen and progesterone receptors in cytology: A comprehensive review , 1992, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[92]  D. Allred,et al.  Immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptors in human breast carcinomas. Evaluation of 130 cases and review of the literature regarding concordance with biochemical assay and clinical relevance. , 1990, Archives of surgery.

[93]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[94]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  The catalog of human cytokeratins: Patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells , 1982, Cell.

[95]  B. Gusterson,et al.  Distribution of myoepithelial cells and basement membrane proteins in the normal breast and in benign and malignant breast diseases. , 1982, Cancer research.

[96]  W. McGuire,et al.  The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer , 1980, Cancer.