ABSTRACTRecently, BIM(Building Information Modeling) is on the rise as a customized solution for construction environment, but construc tion companies rarely introduce and apply BIM in the construction site. Due to such issues, the fact that empirical data for evaluat ing the quantitative effect of BIM application is insufficient might be an another main reason. In the end, construction companies cann ot assure investment effect of BIM and therefore don’t make an investment actively. To activate BIM application, the evaluation system that quantitatively assess usability of BIM needs to be developed . This study aims to suggest a methodology that evaluates the usability quantitatively according to introduction and operation of BIM by construction companies. Accordingly, this study analyzes applicability of 4D CAD by developing an evaluation index and its model with BSC(Balanced Score Card) for 4D CAD, which have high practical use among BIM techniques, and verifies the usability as the entire evaluation index of BIM. Therefore, it is exp ected that the developed assessment model will be utilized as the critical decision-making information in order to introduce related techn iques by identifying the usability and operational issues of 4D CAD.Key words : Building information Modeling(BIM), 4D CAD, Balanced score card(BSC), KPI초 록건설 환경에 맞춤형 대응방안으로 최근 BIM(Building Information Modeling) 이 대두되고 있으나, 대다수의 건설사에서 실제 현장에 BIM을 도입하여 운용하는 사례는 저조한 실정이다. 이러한 원인으로는 다양한 건설 환경에서 BIM 적용에 의한 정량적인 효과가 파악될 수 있는 실증 데이터가 부족한 점도 주요 부분이 되고 있다. 이러한 요인은 결국 BIM 투자 효과에 대한 확신을 갖지 못하게 되고, 회사의 적극적 투자도 유도하지 못하게 된다. 건설사로 하여금 BIM 적용을 유도하기 위해서는 BIM의 활용성을 정량적으로 평가할 수 있는 평가체계가 구축될 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 건설사들의 BIM 도입과 운용에 따른 활용정도를 정량적인 수치로 평가할 수 있는 방안을 제시하고자 한다 . 이를 위해 건설분야 BIM 기술 중 실무 활용성이 높은 4D CAD를 대상으로 BSC (Balanced Score Card) 에 의한 평가지표와 평가 모형을 구축하여 적용성을 분석하며, 향후 BIM 기능 전체의 평가지표로 활용성을 검증하고 있다. 이를 통해 건설업체들은 4D CAD 기술의 활용정도와 운영상 취약점을 파악함으로써 기술 도입을 위한 의사결정의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다 .검색어 : BIM, 4D CAD, 균형성과평가제도, 핵심성과지표Construction Management
[1]
Jung-Hoon Lee,et al.
BSC Perspective of an Exploratory study of Developing CSF/KPI Pool in Korean Construction Industry
,
2006
.
[2]
Qiping Shen,et al.
Measuring the performance of value management studies in construction : critical review
,
2007
.
[3]
Soon-Wook Kwon,et al.
Analysis of success factors in construction IT convergence : applying AHP
,
2011
.
[4]
Moonseo Park,et al.
Quality Performance Management System for Construction Projects Using Quality Performance Indicators
,
2006
.
[5]
Su-Won Yoon,et al.
BSC Based Measurement of Satisfaction Degree For Based BIM Construction Projets
,
2011
.
[6]
Hyeon-Seung Kim,et al.
Development of BIM Functions and System for Construction Project Through Project Life Cycle -Focusing on Bridge Construction Project-
,
2012
.
[7]
임춘성,et al.
KPI 기반의 정보화 수준진단 방법론 개발 및 적용
,
2006
.
[8]
Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.
Scorecard Approach to Benchmarking Organizational Safety Culture in Construction
,
2003
.
[9]
Nashwan Dawood,et al.
Development of 4D based performance indicators in construction industry
,
2009
.
[10]
Jae-Ho Son,et al.
A Study on the Critical Success Factors for Engineering step on Plant Project
,
2007
.
[11]
Ian McEwan,et al.
Closure to “Discrete Particle Modeling of Entrainment from Flat Uniformly Sized Sediment Beds” by Ian McEwan and John Heald
,
2003
.