Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Three-dimensional (3D)-printed casts are used successfully as diagnostic casts in orthodontics. However, whether 3D-printed casts are sufficiently accurate to be used as definitive casts for fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) is unclear. PURPOSE The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fit of 3-unit FDPs fabricated on 3D-printed casts made by digital light processing and to investigate the clinical applicability of 3D printing. MATERIAL AND METHODS A master model was fabricated from epoxy resin. Stone casts were made from dual viscosity impressions (conventional stone cast [CS] group, n=10). The 3D-printed casts were fabricated using a 3D printer after obtaining digital virtual casts by digital scans (3D-printed cast [3DP] group, n=10). All FDPs were fabricated with a 5-axis milling machine. The master model and intaglio surface of the milled FDPs was superimposed using 3D analysis software to measure the accuracy. Two-way ANOVA was performed to identify a significant difference between the groups (3DP and CS) and sides (pontic side, nonpontic side) and their interactive effects (α=.05). The Tukey honestly significant difference test was used for post hoc analysis. RESULTS Two-way ANOVA showed significant differences between the 2 groups (3DP and CS) in the marginal and internal root mean square (RMS) values (P<.001). However, no significant difference was found in the marginal RMS values (P=.762) between the pontic and nonpontic sides. The 3DP showed significantly higher RMS values than the CS (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS The fit of FDPs produced from 3D-printed casts was inferior to that of conventional stone casts; however, all FDPs showed clinically acceptable accuracy. These results suggest that 3D-printed casts have clinical applicability but that further improvement of the 3D printer is necessary for their application in prosthodontics.

[1]  Per Vult von Steyern,et al.  The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  Sebastian B. M. Patzelt,et al.  Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. , 2014, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[3]  Ming C. Leu,et al.  Rapid prototyping in dentistry: technology and application , 2006 .

[4]  Ji-Hwan Kim,et al.  Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  C. Chew,et al.  The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials. , 1993, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[6]  Daniel Edelhoff,et al.  Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing , 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[7]  J. Mclean,et al.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique , 1971, British Dental Journal.

[8]  Albert Mehl,et al.  Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. , 2013, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  Paul G. McMenamin,et al.  Emerging Applications of Bedside 3D Printing in Plastic Surgery , 2015, Front. Surg..

[10]  Chi Zhou,et al.  Digital material fabrication using mask‐image‐projection‐based stereolithography , 2013 .

[11]  Wael Att,et al.  The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. , 2014, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[12]  Hiroshi Hirayama,et al.  Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  Sumeet Kumar Sharma,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Dimension and Surface Detail Accuracy of Models Produced by Three Different Rapid Prototype Techniques , 2012, Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.

[14]  Sang J. Lee,et al.  Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  A. Dawood,et al.  3D printing in dentistry , 2015, BDJ.

[16]  Jack G. Zhou,et al.  PARAMETRIC PROCESS OPTIMIZATION TO IMPROVE THE ACCURACY OF RAPID PROTOTYPED STEREOLITHOGRAPHY PARTS , 2000 .

[17]  Heike Rudolph,et al.  Comparison of an analog and digital quantitative and qualitative analysis for the fit of dental copings , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[18]  Seok-Hwan Cho,et al.  Die spacer thickness reproduction for central incisor crown fabrication with combined computer-aided design and 3D printing technology: an in vitro study. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  G. H. Johnson,et al.  Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  Evanthia Anadioti,et al.  Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  J Pfeiffer,et al.  Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (I). , 1998, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[22]  Chee Ww,et al.  The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials. , 1993 .

[23]  B. Yılmaz,et al.  Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  Aletta Hazeveld,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. , 2014, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  Seok-Hwan Cho,et al.  Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  Konstantinos Chochlidakis,et al.  Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  Geoffrey A Thompson,et al.  Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[28]  G. Sandborgh-Englund,et al.  Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[29]  G. Thomas,et al.  3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. , 2014, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[30]  Sang‐Wan Shin,et al.  Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system , 2015, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[31]  Richard van Noort,et al.  The future of dental devices is digital. , 2012 .