Effect of accelerated aging on permanent deformation and tensile bond strength of autopolymerizing soft denture liners.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different accelerated aging times on permanent deformation and tensile bond strength of two soft chairside liners, acrylic resin (T) and silicone (MS) based. MATERIALS AND METHODS Different specimens were made for each test of each reliner. The specimens (n = 10) were submitted to accelerated aging for 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 cycles. Tensile bond strength testing was performed at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min and permanent deformation with a compressive load of 750 gf. Data were submitted to Mann-Whitney test to compare the materials at different times, and Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests were used for comparing aging intervals within a given reliner. RESULTS MS presented a lower percentage of permanent deformation (p < 0.0001) and higher tensile bond strength (p < 0.0001) than T in all time intervals and was not affected by the accelerated aging process, which reduced the permanent deformation and increased tensile bond strength of T (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION MS presented lower permanent deformation and higher tensile bond strength than T. Although T presented changes in those properties after accelerated aging, both materials might be suited for long-term use.

[1]  A. Meşe,et al.  Effect of storage duration on the hardness and tensile bond strength of silicone- and acrylic resin-based resilient denture liners to a processed denture base acrylic resin. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  I. E. Ruyter,et al.  Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  I. E. Ruyter,et al.  Evaluation of adhesion of chairside hard relining materials to denture base polymers. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  José Renato Ribeiro Pinto,et al.  Evaluation of varying amounts of thermal cycling on bond strength and permanent deformation of two resilient denture liners. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  H. Murata,et al.  Relationship between plasticizer content and tensile bond strength of soft denture liners to a denture base resin. , 2004, Dental materials journal.

[6]  Y. Kulak-Ozkan,et al.  Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  José Renato Ribeiro Pinto,et al.  Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  D. Jagger,et al.  Effect of ageing on the bond strength of a permanent denture soft lining material. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[9]  T. Carrick,et al.  Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[10]  N. Anil,et al.  Microleakage study of various soft denture liners by autoradiography: effect of accelerated aging. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  J. Drummond,et al.  Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  N. Anil,et al.  The effect of accelerated ageing on the mechanical properties of soft denture lining materials. , 1999, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[13]  P. M. Gronet,et al.  Resiliency of surface-sealed temporary soft denture liners. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Bond strength of six soft denture liners processed against polymerized and unpolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate). , 1997, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  R. Jagger,et al.  Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  F. Kawano,et al.  Dynamic viscoelastic properties of processed soft denture liners: Part II--Effect of aging. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  O. Kutay Comparison of tensile and peel bond strengths of resilient liners. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  W. Murphy,et al.  Bond strength and rupture properties of some soft denture liners. , 1992, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[21]  S. Collard,et al.  Adhesion characteristics of visible light-cured denture base material bonded to resilient lining materials. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  W. Amin,et al.  The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. , 1981, Journal of dentistry.

[23]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Viscoelastic and Dynamic Properties of Soft Liners and Tissue Conditioners , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[24]  J. Mccabe Soft lining materials: composition and structure. , 1976, Journal of oral rehabilitation.