NATO MSG-048 Coalition Battle Management Initial Demonstration Lessons Learned and Way Forward

The NATO Modeling and Simulation Group Technical Activity 48 (MSG-048) was chartered in 2006 to investigate the potential of a Coalition Battle Management Language for multinational and NATO interoperation of command and control systems with modeling and simulation. In its May, 2007 meeting, MSG-048 decided to undertake as its first technical project a multinational demonstration, using the US Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) phase 1 prototype Web services as central infrastructure. The demonstration was presented at the I/ITSEC'07 and consisted of three different operational national C2 systems interoperating with three different national simulations, supported by the JBML Web services and an open source C2 visualizer from the US, and the C2 Lexical GUI from Germany. In all, eight software systems from six nations successfully interoperated. This capability was achieved in only six months, based on use of an Internet Reference Implementation that all parties could use to test from their home laboratories, along with a high level of cooperation among technical personnel and military subject matter experts from all participating nations. This paper will provide an overview of the interoperation technology and component systems used in the MSG-048 initial demonstration, describe the lessons learned in the process of creating the demonstration, and summarize the way ahead for the work of MSG-048, including its support for validation of the products of SISO's C-BML Product Group.

[1]  Curtis Blais Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Study Group Report , 2005 .

[2]  Charles D. Turnitsa,et al.  S Web Services for Net-Centric Applications , 2006 .

[3]  Leslie S. Winters,et al.  Composable M&S Web Services for Net-Centric Applications , 2006 .

[4]  A. Alstad,et al.  BML-enabling national C2 systems for coupling to Simulation , 2008 .

[5]  Curtis Blais,et al.  Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) - Phase 1 Development and Demonstration Results , 2007 .

[6]  Curtis Blais,et al.  Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Study Group Final Report , 2005 .

[7]  Michael R. Hieb,et al.  The Environment in Network Centric Operations: A Framework for Command and Control , 2007 .

[8]  Battle Management Language: A Grammar for Specifying Reports , 2007 .

[9]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Developing a Coalition Battle Management Language to Facilitate Interoperability Between Operation CIS, and Simulations in Support of Training and Mission Rehearsal , 2005 .

[10]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) - US Contribution to the C-BML PDG , 2007 .

[11]  J. Mark Pullen,et al.  Extensible Battle Management Language as a Transformation Enabler , 2004, Simul..

[12]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Using Web services and data mediation/storage services to enable command and control to simulation interoperability , 2005, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications.

[13]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Integrating Air and Ground Operations Within a Common Battle Management Language , 2005 .

[14]  J.M. Pullen,et al.  A Grammar-Based Web Service Enabling Multi-domain Distributed Interoperation of Command/Control and Simulation Systems , 2007, 11th IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications (DS-RT'07).