The Black identity, hair product use, and breast cancer scale

Introduction Across the African Diaspora, hair is synonymous with identity. As such, Black women use a variety of hair products, which often contain more endocrine-disrupting chemicals than products used by women of other races. An emerging body of research is linking chemicals in hair products to breast cancer, but there is no validated instrument that measures constructs related to hair, identity, and breast health. The objective of this study was to develop and validate the Black Identity, Hair Product Use, and Breast Cancer Scale (BHBS) in a diverse sample of Black women to measure the social and cultural constructs associated with Black women’s hair product use and perceived breast cancer risk. Methods Participants completed a 27-item scale that queried perceptions of identity, hair products, and breast cancer risk. Principal Component Analyses (PCA) were conducted to establish the underlying component structures, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to determine model fit. Results Participants (n = 185) were African American (73%), African, and Caribbean Black women (27%) aged 29 to 64. PCA yielded two components that accounted for 61% of total variance. Five items measuring sociocultural perspectives about hair and identity loaded on subscale 1 and accounted for 32% of total variance (α = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.77–0.86). Six items assessing perceived breast cancer risk related to hair product use loaded on subscale 2 and accounted for 29% of total variance (α = 0.82 (95% CI = 0.74–0.86). CFA confirmed the two-component structure (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.03; Comparative Fit Index = 0.91; Tucker Lewis Index = 0.88). Conclusions The BHBS is a valid measure of social and cultural constructs associated with Black women’s hair product use and perceived breast cancer risk. This scale is useful for studies that assess cultural norms in the context of breast cancer risk for Black women.

[1]  Robin E. Dodson,et al.  Measurement of endocrine disrupting and asthma‐associated chemicals in hair products used by Black women , 2018, Environmental research.

[2]  Marley W. Watkins,et al.  Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice , 2018 .

[3]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  How Performing PCA and CFA on the Same Data Equals Trouble , 2017 .

[4]  C. Ambrosone,et al.  Hair product use and breast cancer risk among African American and White women , 2017, Carcinogenesis.

[5]  A. Pilnick,et al.  The Role of Hair Loss in Cancer Identity: Perceptions of Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Among Women Treated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ , 2017, Cancer nursing.

[6]  S. Montgomery,et al.  My crown and glory: Community, identity, culture, and Black women’s concerns of hair product-related breast cancer risk , 2017 .

[7]  L. Bogart,et al.  Engaging Institutional Review Boards in Developing a Brief, Community-Responsive Human Subjects Training for Community Partners , 2016, Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action.

[8]  S. Montgomery,et al.  A review of hair product use on breast cancer risk in African American women , 2016, Cancer medicine.

[9]  J. Corrarino Barriers to Mammography Use for Black Women , 2015 .

[10]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2014 .

[11]  Sharon L. Myers,et al.  Estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity of off-the-shelf hair and skin care products , 2014, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[12]  Tabora A. Johnson,et al.  Hair It Is: Examining the Experiences of Black Women with Natural Hair , 2014 .

[13]  K. Courneya,et al.  Lifestyle Behaviors of African American Breast Cancer Survivors: A Sisters Network, Inc. Study , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  T. James-Todd,et al.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Hormonally-Active Hair Product Use: A Plausible Risk Factor for Health Disparities , 2012, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health.

[15]  Robert N Proctor,et al.  The history of the discovery of the cigarette–lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[16]  C. Thompson Black Women, Beauty, and Hair as a Matter of Being , 2009 .

[17]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Breast cancer before age 40 years. , 2009, Seminars in oncology.

[18]  C. Ambrosone,et al.  Hair dye use, meat intake, and tobacco exposure and presence of carcinogen-DNA adducts in exfoliated breast ductal epithelial cells. , 2007, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[19]  C. Perou,et al.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. , 2006, JAMA.

[20]  R. Coates,et al.  Racial differences in the expression of cell cycle–regulatory proteins in breast carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.

[21]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[22]  B. Muthén,et al.  A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model , 1992 .

[23]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[24]  H. Akaike Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[25]  P. Kupradinun,et al.  Carcinogenicity of an oxidation product of p-phenylenediamine. , 1986, Carcinogenesis.

[26]  R. Evarts,et al.  2,4-diaminoanisole sulfate: early effect on thyroid gland morphology and late effect on glandular tissue of Fischer 344 rats. , 1980, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  K. Wallston,et al.  Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[28]  R. Cattell The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[29]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[30]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[31]  Connie L. Engel,et al.  Right to know: exposing toxic fragrance chemicals in beauty, personal care and cleaning products , 2018 .

[32]  A. Jemal,et al.  Breast cancer statistics, 2015: Convergence of incidence rates between black and white women , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[33]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  CA : A Cancer Journal for Clinicians , 2011 .

[34]  R. Darlington,et al.  Factor Analysis , 2008 .

[35]  A. Sasco,et al.  Personal care products that contain estrogens or xenoestrogens may increase breast cancer risk. , 2007, Medical hypotheses.

[36]  F. Worrell,et al.  Validating the Cross Racial Identity Scale , 2002 .

[37]  Ann-Renée Blais,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bdm.414 A Domain-specific Risk-attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[38]  L. King Development of Authenticity in Public Health , 2002 .

[39]  VAN ALSTINE,et al.  Evaluation of Goodness-ofFit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 2001 .

[40]  E. Goldenthal,et al.  Multigeneration reproduction and carcinogenicity studies in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed topically to oxidative hair-colouring formulations containing p-phenylenediamine and other aromatic amines. , 1988, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.