NISC-Based Soft-Input–Soft-Output Demapper

Applications in wireless digital communication field are becoming increasingly complex and diverse. Circuits and systems adopted in this application domain must not only consider performance and implementation constraints but also the requirement of flexibility. The combination of flexibility and the ever increasing performance requirements demands design approach that provides better ways of controlling and managing hardware resources. An application-specific instruction-set processor (ASIP) design approach is a key trend in designing flexible architectures. The ASIP concept implies dynamic scheduling of a set of instructions that generally leads to an overhead related to instruction decoding. The no-instruction-set-computer (NISC) concept has been introduced to reduce this overhead through the adoption of static scheduling. In this brief, the NISC approach is explored through a case-study design of universal demapper for multiple wireless standards. The proposed design has common main architectural choices as a state-of-the-art ASIP for comparison purpose. The obtained results illustrate a significant improvement in execution time and implementation area while using identical computational resources and supporting same flexibility parameters.

[1]  Raymond Knopp,et al.  Low Complexity Metrics for BICM SISO and MIMO Systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[2]  Frank Vahid,et al.  Embedded system design - a unified hardware / software introduction , 2001 .

[3]  Patrick Robertson,et al.  Optimal and sub-optimal maximum a posteriori algorithms suitable for turbo decoding , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[4]  Amer Baghdadi,et al.  Design and prototyping flow of NISC-based flexible MIMO turbo-equalizer , 2014, 2014 25nd IEEE International Symposium on Rapid System Prototyping.

[5]  Charbel Abdel Nour Spectrally efficient coded transmissions for wireless and satellite applications. (Traitements itératifs pour l'amélioration des performances des transmissions codées à forte efficacité spectrale) , 2008 .

[6]  Amer Baghdadi,et al.  Flexible and efficient architecture design for MIMO MMSE-IC linear turbo-equalization , 2013, 2013 Third International Conference on Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT).

[7]  Meng Li,et al.  Design of rotated QAM mapper/demapper for the DVB-T2 standard , 2009, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems.

[8]  Xi Chen,et al.  VLSI Implementation of a High-Throughput Iterative Fixed-Complexity Sphere Decoder , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[9]  Taoka Hidekazu,et al.  Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: the vision of the METIS project , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Daniel D. Gajski NISC: The Ultimate Reconfigurable Component , 2003 .

[11]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  On the optimality of the binary reflected Gray code , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Myung Hoon Sunwoo,et al.  Low complexity soft-decision demapper for high order modulation of DVB-S2 system , 2008, 2008 International SoC Design Conference.

[13]  Rudy Lauwereins,et al.  Design, Automation, and Test in Europe , 2008 .

[14]  Xiaofei Zhang,et al.  Recursive Bit Metric Generation for PSK Signals with Gray Labeling , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[15]  Daniel D. Gajski,et al.  GNR: A Formal Language for Specification, Compilation, and Synthesis of Custom Embedded Processors , 2008 .

[16]  Ender Ayanoglu,et al.  Low complexity decoding of bit-interleaved coded modulation for M-ary QAM , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).