A dynamic multi-stage slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis model with knowledge accumulation and technological evolution

Abstract Dynamic data envelopment analysis (DEA) models are built on the idea that single period optimization is not fully appropriate to evaluate the performance of decision making units (DMUs) through time. As a result, these models provide a suitable framework to incorporate the different cumulative processes determining the evolution and strategic behavior of firms in the economics and business literatures. In the current paper, we incorporate two distinct complementary types of sequentially cumulative processes within a dynamic slacks-based measure DEA model. In particular, human capital and knowledge, constituting fundamental intangible inputs, exhibit a cumulative effect that goes beyond the corresponding factor endowment per period. At the same time, carry-over activities between consecutive periods will be used to define the pervasive effect that technology and infrastructures have on the productive capacity and efficiency of DMUs. The resulting dynamic DEA model accounts for the evolution of the knowledge accumulation and technological development processes of DMUs when evaluating both their overall and per period efficiency. Several numerical examples and a case study are included to demonstrate the applicability and efficacy of the proposed method.

[1]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Characterizing and comparing innovation systems by different ‘modes’ of knowledge production: A proximity approach , 2015 .

[2]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[3]  Nikos C. Varsakelis,et al.  Education, political institutions and innovative activity: A cross-country empirical investigation , 2006 .

[4]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Technology Development through Knowledge Assimilation and Innovation: A European Perspective , 2015, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[5]  B. Lundvall Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool , 2022 .

[6]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[7]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach , 2013 .

[8]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Innovation dynamics and labor force restructuring with asymmetrically developed national innovation systems , 2017 .

[9]  Katsuhito Iwai A CONTRIBUTION TO THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF INNOVATION, IMITATION AND GROWTH * , 2000 .

[10]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .

[11]  P. Howitt,et al.  Endogenous Growth Theory , 1999 .

[12]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Growth with Quality-Improving Innovations: An Integrated Framework , 2005 .

[14]  Debora Di Caprio,et al.  Technological assimilation and divergence in times of crisis , 2015 .

[15]  Christoph Engel,et al.  Who is Afraid of Pirates? An Experiment on the Deterrence of Innovation by Imitation , 2013 .

[16]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga,et al.  A dynamic multi-stage data envelopment analysis model with application to energy consumption in the cotton industry , 2015 .

[19]  Greg N. Gregoriou,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets , 2008, The Journal of Wealth Management.

[20]  Chih-Hai Yang,et al.  An international comparison of R&D efficiency of multiple innovative outputs: The role of the national innovation system , 2011 .

[21]  Aurora A.C. Teixeira,et al.  Structural Change, Competitiveness and Industrial Policy: Painful Lessons from the European Periphery , 2014 .

[22]  R. Färe,et al.  Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA , 1996 .

[23]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  Chance‐constrained data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[24]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[25]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Performance Measurement with Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis , 2013 .

[26]  Santiago M. López,et al.  Poverty Traps in a Frictionless World: The Effects of Learning and Technology Assimilation , 2011 .

[27]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity , 2013 .

[28]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Liang Liang,et al.  Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[31]  Toshihiko Mukoyama,et al.  Innovation, imitation, and growth with cumulative technology , 2003 .

[32]  Meilin Wen Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis , 2014 .

[33]  Christos Pargianas,et al.  Endogenous Economic Institutions and Persistent Income Differences among High Income Countries , 2016 .

[34]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A novel two-stage DEA production model with freely distributed initial inputs and shared intermediate outputs , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Introduction to Modern Economic Growth , 2009 .

[36]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind , 2007 .

[37]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  Innovation, absorptive capacity and growth heterogeneity: Development paths in Latin America 1970–2010 , 2016 .

[38]  Gérard Ballot,et al.  The dynamics of firms in a micro-to-macro model: The role of training, learning and innovation , 1997 .

[39]  Boyan Jovanovic Learning and Growth , 1995 .

[40]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development , 2008 .