Effects of a palatal augmentation prosthesis on lingual function in postoperative patients with oral cancer: coronal section analysis by ultrasonography

A palatal augmentation prosthesis (PAP) is used in postoperative patients with oral cancer as an intraoral appliance. The purpose of this study was to use ultrasound imaging to evaluate the effects of a PAP on lingual movement dynamics when postoperative patients with oral cancer swallowed food while wearing a PAP and to elucidate the effectiveness of the PAP. The subjects were seven patients with tongue cancer. They wore a PAP as an intraoral device to compensate for postoperative dysfunction after surgery for tongue cancer. The measurements were made by using ultrasonography. Ultrasound images of the lingual movement dynamics of the center of the tongue (central grooving of the tongue in a coronal plane, passing through the distal surfaces of both the left and right lower second premolars) during swallowing were obtained in M mode. The mean duration of lingual-palatal contact was 805.4 ± 306.0 ms in patients without a PAP and 621.8 ± 364.9 ms in those with a PAP. The duration decreased significantly in patients wearing a PAP (P = 0.03). The mean total duration of lingual movement was 1612.2 ± 478.3 ms in patients without a PAP and 1245.6 ± 272.5 ms in those with a PAP. The mean total duration decreased significantly in patients with a PAP (P = 0.03). The study results indicated that wearing an intraoral appliance may effectively help lingual movement on swallowing in postoperative patients with oral cancer.

[1]  T. Ono,et al.  Masticatory performance in postmaxillectomy patients with edentulous maxillae fitted with obturator prostheses. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[2]  M. Crary,et al.  Introduction to adult swallowing disorders , 2003 .

[3]  K. Watkin Ultrasound and Swallowing , 1999, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[4]  F. Ardakani Evaluation of Swallowing Patterns of the Tongue Using Real-time B-mode Sonography. , 2006, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[5]  Eiichi Saitoh,et al.  The Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test (RSST) as a Screening Test of Functional Dysphagia (2) Validity of RSST , 2000 .

[6]  P. Kahrilas,et al.  Effects of intraoral prosthetics on swallowing in patients with oral cancer , 2006, Dysphagia.

[7]  M. Marunick,et al.  The efficacy of palatal augmentation prostheses for speech and swallowing in patients undergoing glossectomy: a review of the literature. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  J. Logemann,et al.  Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing , 1986 .

[9]  R. Jacob,et al.  Postglossectomy deglutitory and articulatory rehabilitation with palatal augmentation prostheses. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[10]  P J Kahrilas,et al.  Pharyngeal effects of bolus volume, viscosity, and temperature in patients with dysphagia resulting from neurologic impairment and in normal subjects. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  Eiichi Saitoh,et al.  The Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test (RSST) as a Screening Test of Functional Dysphagia , 2000 .

[12]  S. Kohno,et al.  Treatment of Dysphagic Patients with a Palatal Augmentation Prosthesis Based on a Tongue Movement Function Diagnosis Method by Palatography. , 2003 .

[13]  J. Logemann,et al.  Maxillary reshaping prostheses: effectiveness in improving speech and swallowing of postsurgical oral cancer patients. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  R. Jacob,et al.  Functional results after total or near total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation. , 1991, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.