Pooling decisions decreases variation in response bias and accuracy

[1]  T. Tyler,et al.  Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  G. Stasser,et al.  Collective Choice, Collaboration, and Communication. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  J. Tangen,et al.  Collective intelligence in fingerprint analysis , 2019, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[4]  Stefan M. Herzog,et al.  When experts make inconsistent decisions , 2019 .

[5]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Shared responsibility in collective decisions , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[6]  Max Wolf,et al.  Quorums enable optimal pooling of independent judgements in biological systems , 2018, bioRxiv.

[7]  Stefan M. Herzog,et al.  How to detect high-performing individuals and groups: Decision similarity predicts accuracy , 2019, Science Advances.

[8]  Dan Bang,et al.  Making better decisions in groups , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[9]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[10]  Stefan M. Herzog,et al.  Boosting medical diagnostics by pooling independent judgments , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Jens Krause,et al.  Detection Accuracy of Collective Intelligence Assessments for Skin Cancer Diagnosis. , 2015, JAMA dermatology.

[12]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Trusting Judgements: How to Get the Best out of Experts , 2015 .

[13]  Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers,et al.  Collective Intelligence Meets Medical Decision-Making: The Collective Outperforms the Best Radiologist , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  Philip Tetlock,et al.  Identifying and Cultivating Superforecasters as a Method of Improving Probabilistic Predictions , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[15]  Timothy J. Pleskac,et al.  Dynamics of postdecisional processing of confidence. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  The wisdom of select crowds. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  S. Haneuse,et al.  Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers,et al.  Collective Cognition in Humans: Groups Outperform Their Best Members in a Sentence Reconstruction Task , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  Jens Krause,et al.  Accurate decisions in an uncertain world: collective cognition increases true positives while decreasing false positives , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Association between time spent interpreting, level of confidence, and accuracy of screening mammography. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Lyle H. Ungar,et al.  The Good Judgment Project: A Large Scale Test of Different Methods of Combining Expert Predictions , 2012, AAAI Fall Symposium: Machine Aggregation of Human Judgment.

[22]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[24]  P. Latham,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S11 References Movie S1 Optimally Interacting Minds R�ports , 2022 .

[25]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Edmund A. Mennis.  The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2006 .

[27]  Subhash C. Bagui,et al.  Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms , 2005, Technometrics.

[28]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. , 2005, Psychological review.

[29]  Pär Anders Granhag,et al.  The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts , 2005 .

[30]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  France Légaré,et al.  Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  M. G. Fleming,et al.  Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[33]  H. Welch,et al.  US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. , 2000, BMJ.

[34]  Kenneth R. Hammond,et al.  Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice , 2000 .

[35]  J A Swets,et al.  Psychological Science Can Improve Diagnostic Decisions , 2000, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[36]  T. Tyler,et al.  Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. , 1996 .

[37]  Huanping Dai,et al.  Signal Detection Analysis of the Ideal Group , 1994 .

[38]  D. Kent,et al.  Using Treatment-tradeoff Preferences to Select Diagnostic Strategies , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[39]  J A Swets,et al.  The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[40]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[41]  N. Macmillan,et al.  Response bias : characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and nonparametric indexes , 1990 .

[42]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[43]  G. Owen,et al.  Thirteen theorems in search of the truth , 1983 .

[44]  L. Koran,et al.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Why do some combinations perform better than others? , 2020 .

[46]  T. Evgeniou,et al.  To combine or not to combine: selecting among forecasts and their combinations , 2005 .

[47]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[48]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  Thomas R. Stewart,et al.  Improving Reliability of Judgmental Forecasts , 2001 .

[50]  R D Sorkin,et al.  Signal-detection analysis of group decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[51]  M. DeKay.  The Difference between Blackstone-Like Error Ratios and Probabilistic Standards of Proof , 1996, Law & Social Inquiry.

[52]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Risk-sensitive foraging: A review of the theory , 1992 .

[53]  N. Kerr,et al.  Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: jurors' bias for leniency. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  A. Koriat,et al.  When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why? , 2012, Science.