Sequential application of novel guiding plate system for accurate transoral mandibular reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this article is to introduce and share our experience in the sequential use of a novel guiding plate system for accurate mandibular reconstruction via transoral approach and evaluate its clinical effects. METHODS Ten patients were operated with transoral mandibulectomy and simultaneous mandibular reconstruction using a novel guiding plate system. Postoperatively, aesthetic assessment and quantitative evaluation were analyzed by measuring the parameters like discrepancy in osteotomy lines, mandibular similarity and symmetry. The independent samples t-test was used and P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS All patients underwent planned transoral surgical procedure successfully. The postoperative aesthetic assessment was rated as excellent. The discrepancy between virtual and actual osteotomy lines, at anterior and posterior regions was 0.80 ± 0.08 and 0.98 ± 0.37 mm, respectively. The postoperative evaluation revealed that mandibular similarity was 0.85 ± 0.03, coronal mandibular angle (CMA) 0.66 ± 0.40, axial mandibular angle (AMA) 1.97 ± 1.25, and sagittal mandibular angle (SMA) 1.97 ± 1.05. There was statistically significant difference in the mean values of osteotomy line discrepancy, mandibular similarity and symmetry, among novel guiding plate and traditional plate groups. CONCLUSIONS The novel guiding plate system is a viable and easy-to-use technology for improving the surgical outcomes in patients requiring transoral mandibulectomy and simultaneous mandibular reconstruction by overcoming the problem of limited access due to the presence of lips and cheeks. This can highly improve the precision in osteotomy, fixation of the prebent titanium reconstruction plate, spatial relation transfer, and achieving better symmetry and similarity of mandibular contour.

[1]  A. Kanatas,et al.  Mandibular reconstruction with vascularised bone flaps: a systematic review over 25 years. , 2017, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  Gustaaf J C van Baar,et al.  Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline. , 2019, Oral oncology.

[3]  B. Battiston,et al.  Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning , 2015, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[4]  J. Disa,et al.  Long-term evaluation of bone mass in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[5]  Qin Wu,et al.  Comparative study of three kinds of fibula cutting guides in reshaping fibula for the reconstruction of mandible: An accuracy simulation study in vitro. , 2017, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[6]  Wei Huang,et al.  Using computer simulation and stereomodel for accurate mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest flap. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[7]  M. Metzger,et al.  Iterations of computer- and template assisted mandibular or maxillary reconstruction with free flaps containing the lateral scapular border--Evolution of a biplanar plug-on cutting guide. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[8]  Joep Kraeima,et al.  Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: A new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects. , 2015, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[9]  Sang-Hoon Kang,et al.  Precision of fibula positioning guide in mandibular reconstruction with a fibula graft , 2016, Head & Face Medicine.

[10]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  P. Metzler,et al.  Improved Temporomandibular Joint Position After 3-Dimensional Planned Mandibular Reconstruction. , 2017, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  K. Weimer,et al.  The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[13]  P. Gullane,et al.  Orofacial and Mandibular Reconstruction with the Iliac Crest Free Flap: A Review of 60 Cases and a New Method of Classification , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  A. Gaggl,et al.  An intraoral anastomosing technique for microvascular bone flaps in alveolar ridge reconstruction: first clinical results. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  Sergey Y Turin,et al.  Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling. , 2014, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[16]  J. Levine,et al.  Functional Outcomes of Virtually Planned Free Fibula Flap Reconstruction of the Mandible , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  Yi-han Shen,et al.  A revised approach for mandibular reconstruction with the vascularized iliac crest flap by virtual surgical planning. , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  A. Gaggl,et al.  The intraoral anastomosing technique in reconstructive surgery of the face - A consecutive case series of 70 patients. , 2015, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[19]  Alexander Schramm,et al.  Mandible reconstruction using patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of standard and transfer key methods , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[20]  M. Kesting,et al.  Development of a novel resection and cutting guide for mandibular reconstruction using free fibula flap. , 2018, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[21]  S. Shen,et al.  A New Modified Method for Accurate Mandibular Reconstruction. , 2018, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[22]  C. Marchetti,et al.  Accuracy of CAD/CAM mandibular reconstruction: A three-dimensional, fully virtual outcome evaluation method. , 2018, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[23]  Matthias Mottini,et al.  New approach for virtual surgical planning and mandibular reconstruction using a fibula free flap. , 2016, Oral oncology.

[24]  Huiming Wang,et al.  Utilization of a pre-bent plate-positioning surgical guide system in precise mandibular reconstruction with a free fibula flap. , 2017, Oral oncology.

[25]  M. Hatamleh,et al.  Novel Treatment Planning of Hemimandibular Hyperplasia by the Use of Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided-Design and Computer-Aided-Manufacturing Technologies. , 2017, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[26]  E. Nkenke,et al.  Mandibular reconstruction using intraoral microvascular anastomosis following removal of an ameloblastoma. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.