Fictional robots as a data source in HRI research: Exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations

Because interacting with a robot is a novel experience for most adults, expectations about a robot's capabilities must come from sources other than past experiences. This paper explores the relationship between capabilities of robots portrayed in popular science fiction films and students' expectations about a real robot. A content analysis of 12 American science fiction films showed that fictional robots reliably display cognitive capabilities, but do not consistently exhibit many humanlike social behaviors. Survey data collected from students follow the same basic patterns: people expect robots to have humanlike cognitive capabilities, but not social capabilities. The results are discussed in terms of how an empirical evaluation of cultural artifacts can inform the study of human-robot interaction.

[1]  Heidi Vandebosch,et al.  When the viewer goes to prison: learning fact from watching fiction. A qualitative cultivation study , 2003 .

[2]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Robot-directed speech: using language to assess first-time users' conceptualizations of a robot , 2010, HRI 2010.

[3]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Psychological Implications of Domestic Assistive Technology for the Elderly , 2007, PsychNology J..

[4]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[5]  Manja Lohse.  The role of expectations in HRI , 2009 .

[6]  J. Banner.  Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past , 2003 .

[7]  William S. Horton,et al.  Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production , 2005 .

[8]  Takanori Komatsu,et al.  Effects of the agents’ appearance on people’s estimations about the agents’ abilities: Questionnaire investigations for liberal arts and informatics students , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[9]  Susan Brennan,et al.  Partner-Specific Adaptation in Dialog , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[11]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  What do people expect from robots? , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  T. Kanda,et al.  Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human-robot Interaction , 2006 .

[13]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Joint Action, Interactive Alignment, and Dialog , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[14]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Audience Design in Meaning and Reference , 1982 .

[15]  Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis,et al.  The influence of violent media on children and adolescents: a public-health approach , 2005, The Lancet.

[16]  P. Mcghee,et al.  Television viewing and the learning of sex-role stereotypes , 1980 .

[17]  James D Sargent,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group , 2022 .

[18]  James D. Johnson,et al.  The Influence of Media Violence on Youth , 2003, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[19]  T. Heatherton,et al.  Effect of seeing tobacco use in films on trying smoking among adolescents: cross sectional study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.