A Hydraulic Approach to Equilibria of Resource Selection Games

Drawing intuition from a (physical) hydraulic system, we present a novel framework, constructively showing the existence of a strong Nash equilibrium in resource selection games (i.e., asymmetric singleton congestion games) with nonatomic players, the coincidence of strong equilibria and Nash equilibria in such games, and the uniqueness of the cost of each given resource across all Nash equilibria. Our proofs allow for explicit calculation of Nash equilibrium and for explicit and direct calculation of the resulting (unique) costs of resources, and do not hinge on any fixed-point theorem, on the Minimax theorem or any equivalent result, on linear programming, or on the existence of a potential (though our analysis does provide powerful insights into the potential, via a natural concrete physical interpretation). A generalization of resource selection games, called resource selection games with I.D.-dependent weighting, is defined, and the results are extended to this family, showing the existence of strong equilibria, and showing that while resource costs are no longer unique across Nash equilibria in games of this family, they are nonetheless unique across all strong Nash equilibria, drawing a novel fundamental connection between group deviation and I.D.-congestion. A natural application of the resulting machinery to a large class of constraint-satisfaction problems is also described.

[1]  Ron Holzman,et al.  Network structure and strong equilibrium in route selection games , 2003, Math. Soc. Sci..

[2]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Topological Conditions for Uniqueness of Equilibrium in Networks , 2005, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  Ariel Orda,et al.  Competitive routing in multiuser communication networks , 1993, TNET.

[4]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Network Topology and the Efficiency of Equilibrium , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[5]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Strong and Correlated Strong Equilibria in Monotone Congestion Games , 2006, WINE.

[6]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Noncooperative Market Allocation and the Formation of Downtown , 2014, ArXiv.

[7]  O. A. B. Space,et al.  EQUILIBRIUM POINTS OF NONATOMIC GAMES , 2010 .

[8]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  How bad is selfish routing? , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[9]  P. Hall On Representatives of Subsets , 1935 .

[10]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Social optimality and cooperation in nonatomic congestion games , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[11]  O. Rozenfeld Strong Equilibrium in Congestion Games , 2007 .

[12]  I. Fisher Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices , 1893 .

[13]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .

[14]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case Equilibria , 1999, STACS.

[15]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithms, Games, and the Internet , 2001, ICALP.

[16]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Generic Uniqueness of Equilibrium in Large Crowding Games , 2000, Math. Oper. Res..

[17]  L. Shapley,et al.  Potential Games , 1994 .

[18]  I. Milchtaich,et al.  Congestion Games with Player-Specific Payoff Functions , 1996 .

[19]  Paul G. Spirakis,et al.  The structure and complexity of Nash equilibria for a selfish routing game , 2002, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[20]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[21]  Martin Hoefer,et al.  Computing Pure Nash and Strong Equilibria in Bottleneck Congestion Games , 2010, ESA.

[22]  D. Monderer,et al.  Solution-based congestion games , 2006 .

[23]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Studies in the Economics of Transportation. , 1956 .

[24]  Marek Mikolaj Kaminski,et al.  'Hydraulic' rationing , 2000, Math. Soc. Sci..

[25]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games , 2007, EC '07.

[26]  I. Milchtaich Network Topology and the Efficiency of Equilibrium , 2005 .