Spectral and power efficiency investigation in single- and multi-line-rate optical wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) networks

In order to tackle the increasing heterogeneous global Internet traffic, mixed-line-rate (MLR) optical wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) networks have emerged as the cost- and power-efficient solution. In MLR WDM networks, channels are structured as sub-bands, each of which consists of wavelengths operating at a similar data rate. By reducing the (1) spacing within a sub-band, or (2) spacing between sub-bands operating at different data rates, spectral efficiency can be improved. However, owing to high physical layer impairment levels, decrease in sub-band spacing adversely affects transmission reach of the channels, which results in higher power consumption due to requirement of increased signal regeneration. In this work, we compare power efficiency of various MLR and single-line-rate (SLR) solutions, and also investigate the trade-off that exists between spectral and power efficiency in a WDM network. Simulation results indicate that (1) for high transmission capacities, a combination of 100 Gbps transponders and 40 Gbps regenerators will obtain the highest power efficiency; (2) for long connection distances, a point ofmerging occurs for various SLR and MLR designs, where power consumption is independent of the frequency band distribution; and (3) for MLR systems, both spectral and power efficiency can be improved by using either shorter links with higher bandwidth assignment to 100 Gbps wavelengths, or longer links with higher bandwidth assignment to 40 Gbps wavelengths. Finally, the results indicate that focusing on spectral efficiency alone results in extra power consumption, since high quality of transmission and spectral efficiency leads to increased regeneration.

[1]  A. Klekamp,et al.  Energy and Cost Efficiency of Adaptive and Mixed-Line-Rate IP Over DWDM Networks , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[2]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Optical network design with mixed line rates and multiple modulation formats , 2009, 2009 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers.

[3]  A. Nag,et al.  Energy-efficient and cost-efficient capacity upgrade in mixed-line-rate optical networks , 2012, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[4]  G. Rizzelli,et al.  Reach-Related Energy Consumption in IP-Over-WDM 100G Translucent Networks , 2013, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[5]  Didier Colle,et al.  Power consumption modeling in optical multilayer networks , 2012, Photonic Network Communications.

[6]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Optical WDM Networks , 2006 .

[7]  C. Boisrobert,et al.  Fiber Optic Communication Systems , 1979 .

[8]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  Optical Networks: A Practical Perspective, 3rd Edition , 2009 .

[9]  Sridhar Iyer,et al.  Next-Generation Variable-Line-Rate Optical WDM Networks: Issues and Challenges , 2013 .

[10]  Sridhar Iyer,et al.  Impact of Channel Dynamics, Combined Nonlinearities and ASE Noise on Transmission Performance of all Optical Star WDM Networks , 2011 .

[11]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Optical WDM Networks (Optical Networks) , 2006 .

[12]  O. Rival,et al.  Resource requirements in mixed-line rate and elastic dynamic optical networks , 2012, OFC/NFOEC.

[13]  D. Verchere,et al.  Power management of optoelectronic interfaces for dynamic optical networks , 2011, 2011 37th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[14]  Peter J. Winzer,et al.  Advanced Optical Modulation Formats , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  On Routing and Transmission-Range Determination of Multi-Bit-Rate Signals Over Mixed-Line-Rate WDM Optical Networks for Carrier Ethernet , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[16]  Massimo Tornatore,et al.  Energy efficient Traffic-Aware design of on-off Multi-Layer translucent optical networks , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[17]  Marc Ruiz,et al.  Design of green optical networks with signal quality guarantee , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[18]  Bruno Lavigne,et al.  40G and 100G deployment on 10G infrastructure: Market overview and trends, coherent versus conventional technology , 2010, 2010 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication (OFC/NFOEC), collocated National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[19]  Fan Ji,et al.  Energy-Efficient Translucent Optical Transport Networks With Mixed Regenerator Placement , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[20]  N Sambo,et al.  Modeling and Distributed Provisioning in 10–40–100-Gb/s Multirate Wavelength Switched Optical Networks , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[21]  Laura Strauss,et al.  Optical Networks A Practical Perspective , 2016 .

[22]  Ting Wang,et al.  On the Design of Energy-Efficient Mixed-Line-Rate (MLR) Optical Networks , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[23]  Idelfonso Tafur Monroy,et al.  Energy efficiency analysis for flexible-grid OFDM-based optical networks , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[24]  G. Agrawal Fiber-Optic Communication Systems: Agrawal/Fiber-Optic , 2010 .