Generalization of the polar representation in time domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy for biological applications: practical implementation

The polar representation or phasor, which provides a fast and visual indication on the number of exponentials present in the intensity decay of the fluorescence lifetime images is increasingly used in time domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy experiments. The calculations of the polar coordinates in time domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy experiments involve several experimental parameters (e.g. instrumental response function, background, angular frequency, number of temporal channels) whose role has not been exhaustively investigated. Here, we study theoretically, computationally and experimentally the influence of each parameter on the polar calculations and suggest parameter optimization for minimizing errors. We identify several sources of mistakes that may occur in the calculations of the polar coordinates and propose adapted corrections to compensate for them. For instance, we demonstrate that the numerical integration method employed for integrals calculations may induce errors when the number of temporal channels is low. We report theoretical generalized expressions to compensate for these deviations and conserve the semicircle integrity, facilitating the comparison between fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy images acquired with distinct channels number. These theoretical generalized expressions were finally corroborated with both Monte Carlo simulations and experiments.

[1]  J. Lakowicz Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy , 1983 .

[2]  Y. Usson,et al.  Upgrading time domain FLIM using an adaptive Monte Carlo data inflation algorithm , 2011, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[3]  A. Żarnecki Global analysis of , 1999, hep-ph/9904334.

[4]  Dr. M. G. Worster Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1947, Nature.

[5]  C. Seidel,et al.  An experimental comparison of the maximum likelihood estimation and nonlinear least-squares fluorescence lifetime analysis of single molecules. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  E Gratton,et al.  The epidermal Ca(2+) gradient: Measurement using the phasor representation of fluorescent lifetime imaging. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[7]  C. Spriet,et al.  Three‐dimensional polar representation for multispectral fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[8]  Philip Rabinowitz,et al.  Methods of Numerical Integration , 1985 .

[9]  P J Verveer,et al.  Global analysis of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy data. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[10]  E. Gratton,et al.  The phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging analysis. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[11]  J. Siegel,et al.  Time‐domain whole‐field fluorescence lifetime imaging with optical sectioning , 2001, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  M. Strauba,et al.  Fluorescence lifetime three-dimensional microscopy with picosecond precision using a multifocal multiphoton microscope , 1998 .

[13]  K. Carlsson,et al.  Theoretical investigation of the signal-to-noise ratio in fluorescence lifetime imaging. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  P. R. Barber,et al.  A Bayesian method for single molecule, fluorescence burst analysis , 2010, Biomedical optics express.

[15]  E. Gratton,et al.  The Measurement and Analysis of Heterogeneous Emissions by Multifrequency Phase and Modulation Fluorometry , 1984 .

[16]  B. Chromy,et al.  Efficient maximum likelihood estimator fitting of histograms , 2010, Nature Methods.

[17]  P. Kapusta,et al.  Instrument response standard in time-resolved fluorescence. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[18]  Brian Herman,et al.  Development of a multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy system using a streak camera , 2003 .

[19]  T Wilson,et al.  Low‐cost, frequency‐domain, fluorescence lifetime confocal microscopy , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[20]  R. Clegg,et al.  Polar Plot Representation for Frequency-Domain Analysis of Fluorescence Lifetimes , 2005, Journal of Fluorescence.

[21]  F. Waharte,et al.  Setup and characterization of a multiphoton FLIM instrument for protein–protein interaction measurements in living cells , 2006, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[22]  Marc Tramier,et al.  Quantitative FRET analysis by fast acquisition time domain FLIM at high spatial resolution in living cells. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Dave Trinel,et al.  Enhanced FRET contrast in lifetime imaging , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[24]  P. Verveer,et al.  Graphical representation and multicomponent analysis of single‐frequency fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy data , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[25]  Peter J Verveer,et al.  Global analysis of time correlated single photon counting FRET-FLIM data. , 2009, Optics express.

[26]  Farzad Fereidouni,et al.  A modified phasor approach for analyzing time‐gated fluorescence lifetime images , 2011, Journal of microscopy.

[27]  Robert M. Clegg,et al.  Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM): Spatial resolution of microstructures on the nanosecond time scale , 1993 .

[28]  K. König,et al.  Fluorescence lifetime imaging by time‐correlated single‐photon counting , 2004, Microscopy research and technique.

[29]  Y. Usson,et al.  Quantitative comparison of polar approach versus fitting method in time domain FLIM image analysis , 2011, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[30]  Jean-François Richard,et al.  Methods of Numerical Integration , 2000 .

[31]  C. Spriet,et al.  Optimized protocol of a frequency domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscope for FRET measurements , 2009, Microscopy research and technique.