Human Abuse Potential and Cognitive Effects of Taranabant, a Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Inverse Agonist: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Crossover Study in Recreational Polydrug Users

Introduction Taranabant is a cannabinoid 1 receptor inverse agonist that was in development for treatment of obesity. Because of central nervous system effects, the study was performed to assess the abuse potential and cognitive effects of taranabant in recreational polydrug users compared with phentermine, dronabinol, and placebo. Methods Stimulant- and cannabis-experienced polydrug users (N = 30) were randomized in a double-blind crossover study to receive taranabant 2, 4, 10, and 20 mg; phentermine 45 and 90 mg; dronabinol 20 mg; and placebo. Subjective and neurocognitive measures were administered for 24 hours, and peak/peak change from baseline effects were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. Results Phentermine 45 and 90 mg showed abuse-related subjective effects versus placebo, including drug liking, overall drug liking, and other positive/stimulant effects, whereas dronabinol 20 mg showed abuse-related positive, cannabis-like, and sedative effects. Taranabant was not significantly different from placebo on most of the subjective measures other than negative/dysphoric effects at the highest dose, and its effects were significantly less pronounced relative to phentermine and dronabinol on most measures. Phentermine improved cognitive/motor performance and dronabinol impaired motor/cognitive performance on some measures, whereas taranabant 4 and 20 mg had minor impairment effects on manual tracking. Conclusions The phentermine and dronabinol results demonstrate the validity and sensitivity of the study. Taranabant did not consistently show stimulant/cannabis-like effects or abuse potential in recreational polydrug users, indicating that cannabinoid 1 receptor inverse agonists/antagonists are unlikely to be recreationally abused.

[1]  I. Weiner,et al.  AVE1625, a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, as a co-treatment with antipsychotics for schizophrenia: improvement in cognitive function and reduction of antipsychotic-side effects in rodents , 2011, Psychopharmacology.

[2]  J. Dodart,et al.  MK-7128, a novel CB1 receptor inverse agonist, improves scopolamine-induced learning and memory deficits in mice , 2011, Behavioural pharmacology.

[3]  E. Sellers,et al.  A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover study to evaluate the subjective abuse potential and cognitive effects of nabiximols oromucosal spray in subjects with a history of recreational cannabis use , 2011, Human psychopharmacology.

[4]  T. Rubino,et al.  Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonism prevents neurochemical and behavioural deficits induced by chronic phencyclidine. , 2011, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[5]  D. Meier,et al.  Subjective and Objective Effects of the Novel Triple Reuptake Inhibitor Tesofensine in Recreational Stimulant Users , 2010, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[6]  K. Fujioka,et al.  A one‐year study to assess the safety and efficacy of the CB1R inverse agonist taranabant in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes , 2010, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[7]  J. Lange,et al.  SLV330, a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, ameliorates deficits in the T-maze, object recognition and Social Recognition Tasks in rodents , 2010, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[8]  F. Vollenweider,et al.  Potential antipsychotic properties of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptor antagonists , 2010, The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  CB1 receptor inverse agonist pharmacotherapy for metabolic disorders , 2009 .

[10]  P. Beardsley Evaluation of taranabant (MK‐0364) for its self‐administration in rhesus monkeys and for its discriminative stimulus effects in rats , 2009 .

[11]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  Cannabinoid-1 receptor inverse agonists: current understanding of mechanism of action and unanswered questions , 2009, International Journal of Obesity.

[12]  J. Ramaekers,et al.  Neurocognitive performance during acute THC intoxication in heavy and occasional cannabis users , 2009, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[13]  B. Thomas,et al.  Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists as potential pharmacotherapies for drug abuse disorders , 2009, International review of psychiatry.

[14]  J. Krystal,et al.  Blunted Psychotomimetic and Amnestic Effects of Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Frequent Users of Cannabis , 2008, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[15]  J. Zacny,et al.  The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications. , 2008, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[16]  P. Rothenberg,et al.  Multiple‐Dose Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Taranabant, a Novel Selective Cannabinoid‐1 Receptor Inverse Agonist, in Healthy Male Volunteers , 2008, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[17]  Rodney J. Moore,et al.  Abuse liability assessment of atomoxetine in a drug-abusing population. , 2008, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[18]  P. Rothenberg,et al.  Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Taranabant, a Novel Selective Cannabinoid‐1 Receptor Inverse Agonist, for the Treatment of Obesity: Results From a Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Single Oral Dose Study in Healthy Volunteers , 2008, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[19]  T. Rubino,et al.  The role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in drug addiction. , 2008, Drug news & perspectives.

[20]  L. Wise,et al.  Combination of Rimonabant and Donepezil Prolongs Spatial Memory Duration , 2007, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[21]  M. Jensen,et al.  Efficacy and tolerability of rimonabant in overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled study , 2006, The Lancet.

[22]  M R Moeller,et al.  Cognition and motor control as a function of Delta9-THC concentration in serum and oral fluid: limits of impairment. , 2006, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[23]  T. Kirkham,et al.  Endocannabinoids in the regulation of appetite and body weight , 2005, Behavioural pharmacology.

[24]  V. Marzo,et al.  Endocannabinoid control of food intake and energy balance , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  S. Vosburg,et al.  Reinforcing effects of oral Δ9-THC in male marijuana smokers in a laboratory choice procedure , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[26]  R. Griffiths,et al.  Principles of initial experimental drug abuse liability assessment in humans. , 2003, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[27]  C. Brignell,et al.  Cognitive and subjective dose-response effects of acute oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in infrequent cannabis users , 2002, Psychopharmacology.

[28]  M. Dance,et al.  Evaluation of the reinforcing effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, SR141716, in rhesus monkeys. , 2002, European journal of pharmacology.

[29]  C. Hart,et al.  Effects of Acute Smoked Marijuana on Complex Cognitive Performance , 2001, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[30]  S. Heishman,et al.  Blockade of effects of smoked marijuana by the CB1-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716. , 2001, Archives of general psychiatry.

[31]  I. Kilpatrick,et al.  Comparison of the effects of sibutramine and other weight‐modifying drugs on extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats , 2000, Synapse.

[32]  H. Wit,et al.  Responses to Oral Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Frequent and Infrequent Marijuana Users , 1999, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[33]  M. Scheinbaum,et al.  Sibutramine: a new weight loss agent without evidence of the abuse potential associated with amphetamines. , 1998, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[34]  H. Wit,et al.  Effects of Expectancies on Subjective Responses to Oral Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol , 1998, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[35]  Howard L. Kaplan,et al.  When do professional psychologists need professional programmers’ tools? , 1985 .

[36]  C. Schuster,et al.  'Hangover' effects the morning after marijuana smoking. , 1985, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[37]  R. Straight,et al.  Sensory, perceptual, motor and cognitive functioning and subjective reports following oral administration ofΔ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol , 1976, Psychopharmacology.

[38]  D. Jasinski,et al.  Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man , 1971, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[39]  C. Haertzen ADDICTION RESEARCH CENTER INVENTORY (ARCI): DEVELOPMENT OF A GENERAL DRUG ESTIMATION SCALE , 1965, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[40]  E. Williams Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments , 1949 .

[41]  Sandra M. Sanabria-Bohórquez,et al.  The acyclic CB1R inverse agonist taranabant mediates weight loss by increasing energy expenditure and decreasing caloric intake. , 2008, Cell metabolism.

[42]  J. Zacny,et al.  Reinforcing and subjective effects of oral Δ9-THC and smoked marijuana in humans , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[43]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[44]  C. Schuster,et al.  Abuse liability assessment of sibutramine, a novel weight control agent , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[45]  H. de Wit,et al.  Effects of expectancies on subjective responses to oral delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol. , 1998, Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior.

[46]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[47]  J. Zacny,et al.  Reinforcing and subjective effects of oral delta 9-THC and smoked marijuana in humans. , 1992, Psychopharmacology.

[48]  J. Henningfield,et al.  Abuse liability assessment in human subjects , 1984 .

[49]  M. Manosevitz,et al.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 2022 .