A Comparative Study of 2 Screening Tools for Locomotive Syndrome (The “Loco-check” and the “GLFS-25”): An Orthopedic Outpatient-based Survey

study ABSTRACT Background: In 2007, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) proposed the term “locomotive syndrome” (LS) to designate a condition in high-risk groups with musculoskeletal diseases who are highly likely to require nursing care. The JOA developed two screening tools for LS: The 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (“GLFS-25”) and the “Loco-check”. The present study represents the first comparison of these tools. Methods: To compare the diagnostic abilities and characteristics of the two diagnostic tools, we investigated the associations of LS with clinical information including the general status, orthopedic diseases (degenerative diseases), past history (general diseases) and exercise activities using a questionnaire survey employing both diagnostic tools at Juntendo University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) from April to June 2014. Results: 664 of 1,027 patients answered both questionnaires. Three hundred nineteen (48.0%) and 251 (37.8%) were diagnosed with LS according to the “Loco-check” and “GLFS-25”, respectively. Our survey indicated that the “Loco-check” had a 10.2% higher detection rate than the “GLFS-25”. The correlation between the scores was investigated. The Spearman’s rank coefficient was r=0.454 and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.8181, which indicated a moderate correlation. We then investigated the associations between LS and the clinical factors of the patients. The results showed that female gender, advanced age, a high BMI, lumbar spondylosis and heart disease were significantly associated with a diagnosis of LS with both of the diagnostic tools. Conclusions: We investigated the associations between the prevalence of LS and ortho-clinical information in an outpatient cohort based on both the “Loco-check” and the “GLFS-25”. These analyses are the first to report compared statistical associations between both tools. These analyses also provide critical information to help clinicians determine whether to use the “Loco-check” or “GLFS-25” in various situations.

[1]  Noriko Yoshimura,et al.  Association between new indices in the locomotive syndrome risk test and decline in mobility: third survey of the ROAD study , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[2]  Kunihiko Hayashi,et al.  Prevalence of locomotive syndrome in Japan: a nationwide, cross-sectional Internet survey , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[3]  N. Ishiguro,et al.  Waist circumference is associated with locomotive syndrome in elderly females , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[4]  Tsuyoshi Saito,et al.  An outpatient-based survey about the recognition of locomotive syndrome and the results of the loco-check at a university hospital in Tokyo. , 2014 .

[5]  N. Ishiguro,et al.  The influence of locomotive syndrome on health-related quality of life in a community-living population , 2013, Modern rheumatology.

[6]  N. Ishiguro,et al.  Threshold values of physical performance tests for locomotive syndrome , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[7]  N. Ishiguro,et al.  IMPACT OF BACK MUSCLE STRENGTH AND AGING ON LOCOMOTIVE SYNDROME IN COMMUNITY LIVING JAPANESE WOMEN , 2013, Nagoya journal of medical science.

[8]  S. Nakaji,et al.  Evaluation of locomotive disability using loco-check: a cross-sectional study in the Japanese general population , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[9]  N. Ishiguro,et al.  Physical performance tests are useful for evaluating and monitoring the severity of locomotive syndrome , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[10]  N. Ishiguro,et al.  Impact of spinal imbalance and back muscle strength on locomotive syndrome in community-living elderly people , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[11]  N. Ishiguro,et al.  Effect of back muscle strength and sagittal spinal imbalance on locomotive syndrome in Japanese men. , 2012, Orthopedics.

[12]  H. Ishibashi [Locomotive syndrome and frailty. Concepts and methods of locomotion training]. , 2012, Clinical calcium.

[13]  Masami Akai,et al.  Development of a screening tool for risk of locomotive syndrome in the elderly: the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[14]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  The concept and treatment of locomotive syndrome: its acceptance and spread in Japan , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[15]  Kozo Nakamura Locomotive syndrome: disability-free life expectancy and locomotive organ health in a “super-aged” society , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[16]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  A “super-aged” society and the “locomotive syndrome” , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[17]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.