On the estimation of swimming and flying forces from wake measurements

SUMMARY The transfer of momentum from an animal to fluid in its wake is fundamental to many swimming and flying modes of locomotion. Hence, properties of the wake are commonly studied in experiments to infer the magnitude and direction of locomotive forces. The determination of which wake properties are necessary and sufficient to empirically deduce swimming and flying forces is currently made ad hoc. This paper systematically addresses the question of the minimum number of wake properties whose combination is sufficient to determine swimming and flying forces from wake measurements. In particular, it is confirmed that the spatial velocity distribution (i.e. the velocity field) in the wake is by itself insufficient to determine swimming and flying forces, and must be combined with the fluid pressure distribution. Importantly, it is also shown that the spatial distribution of rotation and shear (i.e. the vorticity field) in the wake is by itself insufficient to determine swimming and flying forces, and must be combined with a parameter that is analogous to the fluid pressure. The measurement of this parameter in the wake is shown to be identical to a calculation of the added-mass contribution from fluid surrounding vortices in the wake, and proceeds identically to a measurement of the added-mass traditionally associated with fluid surrounding solid bodies. It is demonstrated that the velocity/pressure perspective is equivalent to the vorticity/vortex-added-mass approach in the equations of motion. A model is developed to approximate the contribution of wake vortex added-mass to locomotive forces, given a combination of velocity and vorticity field measurements in the wake. A dimensionless parameter, the wake vortex ratio (denoted Wa), is introduced to predict the types of wake flows for which the contribution of forces due to wake vortex added-mass will become non-negligible. Previous wake analyses are re-examined in light of this parameter to infer the existence and importance of wake vortex added-mass in those cases. In the process, it is demonstrated that the commonly used time-averaged force estimates based on wake measurements are not sufficient to prove that an animal is generating the locomotive forces necessary to sustain flight or maintain neutral buoyancy.

[1]  T. Daniel.  Unsteady Aspects of Aquatic Locomotion , 1984 .

[2]  I. Eames,et al.  Displacement of horizontal layers by bubbles injected into fluidised beds , 1997 .

[3]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Dynamic pressure maps for wings and tails of pigeons in slow, flapping flight, and their energetic implications , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  Morteza Gharib,et al.  The role of optimal vortex formation in biological fluid transport , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Alexander J. Smits,et al.  A Physical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics , 1999 .

[6]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[7]  S. Sunada,et al.  A new method for explaining the generation of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight , 2001 .

[8]  A Hedenström,et al.  A family of vortex wakes generated by a thrush nightingale in free flight in a wind tunnel over its entire natural range of flight speeds , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  John H. Costello,et al.  Vortex motion in the ocean: In situ visualization of jellyfish swimming and feeding flows , 2005 .

[10]  Lauder,et al.  Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  F. Noca,et al.  A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR EVALUATING TIME-DEPENDENT FLUID DYNAMIC FORCES ON BODIES, USING ONLY VELOCITY FIELDS AND THEIR DERIVATIVES , 1999 .

[12]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency , 2003, Nature.

[13]  I. Eames,et al.  The concept of drift and its application to multiphase and multibody problems , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Flavio Noca,et al.  Measuring instantaneous fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives , 1997 .

[15]  G. Lauder,et al.  Fish Exploiting Vortices Decrease Muscle Activity , 2003, Science.

[16]  I. Eames,et al.  Fluid transport by dipolar vortices , 1998 .

[17]  J. M. Bush,et al.  Fluid displacement by high Reynolds number bubble motion in a thin gap , 1998 .

[18]  G. Pedrizzetti,et al.  Vortex Dynamics , 2011 .

[19]  B. Tobalske,et al.  Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird , 2005, Nature.

[20]  C. Darwin,et al.  Note on hydrodynamics , 1953, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  T. Daniel.  Mechanics and energetics of medusan jet propulsion , 1983 .

[22]  John O. Dabiri,et al.  Fluid entrainment by isolated vortex rings , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  S. Belcher,et al.  Drift, partial drift and Darwin's proposition , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Paul S. Krueger,et al.  The significance of vortex ring formation to the impulse and thrust of a starting jet , 2003 .

[25]  T. Brooke Benjamin,et al.  Note on added mass and drift , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[27]  L. Rosenhead.  Theoretical Hydrodynamics , 1960, Nature.