Modern triage in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND Because the volume of patient admissions to an emergency department (ED) cannot be precisely planned, the available resources may become overwhelmed at times ("crowding"), with resulting risks for patient safety. The aim of this study is to identify modern triage instruments and assess their validity and reliability. METHODS Review of selected literature retrieved by a search on the terms "emergency department" and "triage." RESULTS Emergency departments around the world use different triage systems to assess the severity of incoming patients' conditions and assign treatment priorities. Our study identified four such instruments: the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), the Manchester Triage System (MTS), and the Emergency Severity Index (ESI). Triage instruments with 5 levels are superior to those with 3 levels in both validity and reliability (p<0.01). Good to very good reliability has been shown for the best-studied instruments, CTAS and ESI (κ-statistics: 0.7 to 0.95), while ATS and MTS have been found to be only moderately reliable (κ-statistics: 0.3 to 0.6). MTS and ESI are both available in German; of these two, only the ESI has been validated in German-speaking countries. CONCLUSION Five-level triage systems are valid and reliable methods for assessment of the severity of incoming patients' conditions by nursing staff in the emergency department. They should be used in German emergency departments to assign treatment priorities in a structured and dependable fashion.

[1]  G. Braitberg,et al.  Multidisciplinary assessment at triage: a new way forward. , 2004, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[2]  D. Eitel,et al.  Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[3]  David Warren,et al.  Revisions to the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale paediatric guidelines (PaedCTAS). , 2008, CJEM.

[4]  D. Eitel,et al.  Assessment of inter-observer reliability of two five-level triage and acuity scales: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, CJEM.

[5]  G. Innes,et al.  Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. , 2003, CJEM.

[6]  T. Strout,et al.  Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients. , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[7]  S. Doherty,et al.  Inpatient mortality as related to triage category in three New South Wales regional base hospitals. , 2003, Emergency medicine.

[8]  Brian H Rowe,et al.  Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[9]  A. V. van Vugt,et al.  Validation of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in self-referred patients in a European emergency department , 2007, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[10]  Mark Little,et al.  Inter‐rater reliability of the National Triage Scale over 11,500 simulated occasions of triage , 2009 .

[11]  Julie Considine,et al.  The Australasian Triage Scale: examining emergency department nurses' performance using computer and paper scenarios. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  T. Perneger,et al.  Interactive triage simulator revealed important variability in both process and outcome of emergency triage. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  David P. Meurer,et al.  The effect of training on nurse agreement using an electronic triage system. , 2007, CJEM.

[14]  Chih-Hsien Chi,et al.  Comparison of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and the Taiwan Triage System in predicting resource utilization. , 2006, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[15]  T. Strout,et al.  Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: validity and survival with the Emergency Severity Index. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[16]  Judith Tintinalli,et al.  Five-level triage system more effective than three-level in tertiary emergency department. , 2002, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[17]  P. Standen,et al.  Victorian nurses demonstrate concordance in the application of the National Triage Scale , 2009 .

[18]  R C Wuerz,et al.  Implementation and refinement of the emergency severity index. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[19]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[20]  R. Shelton.  The Emergency Severity Index 5-Level Triage System , 2009, Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN.

[21]  Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  S. Walter,et al.  Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. , 2002, CJEM.

[23]  A. Gafni,et al.  Correlation of the Canadian Pediatric Emergency Triage and Acuity Scale to ED resource utilization. , 2008, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[24]  S. Manzano,et al.  Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[25]  D. Amre,et al.  Agreement Among Pediatric Health Care Professionals With the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale Guidelines , 2004, Pediatric emergency care.

[26]  K. Mackway-Jones,et al.  Detecting high-risk patients with chest pain. , 2003, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[27]  David A Thompson,et al.  Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA Five-level Triage Task Force. , 2005, Journal of Emergency Nursing.

[28]  D. Eitel,et al.  The emergency severity index triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[29]  Stephen Pax Leonard,et al.  Consistency of retrospective triage decisions as a standardised instrument for audit. , 1999, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[30]  Paula Tanabe,et al.  The Emergency Severity Index (version 3) 5-level triage system scores predict ED resource consumption. , 2004, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[31]  R. Wuerz,et al.  Emergency severity index triage category is associated with six-month survival. ESI Triage Study Group. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[32]  M. Bullard,et al.  Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. , 2008, CJEM.

[33]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Validity of the Manchester Triage System in paediatric emergency care , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[34]  M. Murray,et al.  Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? , 2003, CJEM.

[35]  K. Eva,et al.  Predictive validity comparison of two five-level triage acuity scales. , 2004, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[36]  D. Amre,et al.  Reliability of a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[37]  L. Wallis,et al.  A prospective evaluation of the Cape triage score in the emergency department of an urban public hospital in South Africa , 2008, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[38]  W. Sermeus,et al.  Systematic triage in the emergency department using the Australian National Triage Scale: a pilot project , 2001, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[39]  M. V. van Baar,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study , 2008, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[40]  M. Cooke,et al.  Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill? , 1999, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[41]  S. Walter,et al.  Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[42]  Richard C. Wuerz,et al.  Inconsistency of Emergency Department Triage , 1998 .

[43]  P. Yarnold,et al.  Reliability and validity of scores on The Emergency Severity Index version 3. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.