The Effects of Participatory Mode and Task Workload on the Detection of Dynamic System Failures

The ability of operators to detect step changes in the order of control dynamics is investigated as a joint function of a) participatory mode, whether subjects are actively controlling those dynamics or are monitoring an autopilot controlling them, and b) concurrent task workload. Five subjects either tracked or monitored the system dynamics on a two-dimensional pursuit display under single task conditions and concurrently with a "subcritical" tracking task at two difficulty levels Detection performance was faster and only slightly less accurate in the manual as opposed to the autopilot mode. Performance in each mode was derogated by the concurrent tracking requirement, but not by increases in loading task difficulty. Further analysis indicated that manual superiority was attributable to the additional proprioceptive information resulting from operator-control adaptation to the system change.

[1]  T. Jordan.  Characteristics of Visual and Proprioceptive Response Times in the Learning of a Motor Skill , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Renwick E. Curry,et al.  Detection of Random Process Failures by Human Monitors , 1976 .

[3]  H Kantowitz,et al.  Testing tapping timesharing, II: Auditory secondary task. , 1976, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  The Effects of Visual and Proprioceptive Feedback on Motor Learning , 1975 .

[5]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[6]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  An optimal control model of human response part I: Theory and validation , 1970 .

[7]  C S Watson,et al.  Detectability of auditory signals presented without defined observation intervals. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S Fidell,et al.  Sensory function in multimodal signal detection. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Arye R. Ephrath,et al.  Detection by Pilots of System Failures during Instrument Landings , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  J. F. Mackworth.  Vigilance and habituation: A neuropsychological approach , 1969 .

[11]  Arye R. Ephrath,et al.  Monitoring and Control of Unreliable Systems , 1976 .

[12]  J. D. McDonnell.  A Preliminary Study of Human Operator Behavior Following a Step Change in the Controlled Element , 1966 .

[13]  L. Young.  On adaptive manual control. , 1969, Ergonomics.

[14]  B. Kerr,et al.  Processing demands during mental operations , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[15]  H. R. Jex,et al.  A ``Critical'' Tracking Task for Manual Control Research , 1966 .

[16]  D Vreuls,et al.  PILOT FAILURE DETECTION PERFORMANCE WITH THREE LEVELS OF FAULT WARNING INFORMATION , 1968 .

[17]  Duncan C. Miller,et al.  The Adaptive Response of the Human Controller to Sudden Changes in Controlled Process Dynamics , 1967 .

[18]  R. Pew.  The speed-accuracy operating characteristic , 1969 .

[19]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Event Related Cortical Potential as an Index of Task Workload , 1977 .

[20]  D H Weir,et al.  Model of human operator response to step transitions in controlled element dynamics. NASA CR-671. , 1966, NASA contractor report. NASA CR. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[21]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Monitoring Behavior and Supervisory Control , 1976 .

[22]  Gunnar Johannsen,et al.  Human Performance and Workload in Simulated Landing-Approaches with Autopilot-Failures , 1976 .

[23]  Thomas B. Sheridan.  Preview of Models of the Human Monitor/Supervisor , 1976 .

[24]  M I Posner,et al.  Attention to visual and kinesthetic components of skills. , 1974, Brain research.

[25]  C. D. Wickens,et al.  The internal model: A study of the relative contribution of proprioception and visual information to failure detection in dynamic systems. [sensitivity of operators versus monitors to failures] , 1978 .

[26]  Gunnar Johannsen.  Preview of Man-Vehicle Control Session , 1976 .

[27]  J. Lappin,et al.  The latency operating characteristic. I. Effects of stimulus probability on choice reaction time. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  R. W. Pew,et al.  Human perceptual-motor performance , 1974 .