Towards a functional basis for predicting vegetation patterns; incorporating plant traits in habitat distribution models

Reliably predicting vegetation distribution requires habitat distribution models (HDMs) that are ecologically sound. Current correlative HDMs are increasingly criticized because they lack sufficient functional basis. To include functional information into these models, we integrated two concepts from community ecology into a new type of HDM. We incorporated: 1) species selection by their traits in which only those species that pass the environmental filter can be part of the community (assembly theory); 2) that the occurrence probability of a community is determined by the extent to which the community mean traits fit the required traits as set by the environment. In this paper, our trait-based HDM is presented and its predictive capacity explored. Our approach consists of two steps. In step 1, four plant traits (stem-specific density and indicator values for nutrients, moisture and acidity) are predicted from four dominant environmental drivers (disturbance, nutrient supply, moisture supply and acidity) using regression. In step 2, these traits are used to predict the occurrence probability of 13 vegetation types, covering the majority of vegetation types across the Netherlands. The model was validated by comparison to the observed vegetation type for 263 plots in the Netherlands. Model performance was within the range of conventional HDMs and decreased with increasing uncertainty in the environment-trait relationships and with an increasing number of vegetation types. This study shows that including functionality into HDMs is not necessarily at the cost of model performance, while it has several conceptual advantages among including an increased insight in the functional characteristics of the vegetation and sources of unpredictability in community assembly. As such it is a promising first step towards more functional HDMs. Further development of a trait-based HDM hinges on replacing indicator values by truly functional traits and the translation of these relationships into mechanistic relationships.

[1]  Jan-Philip M. Witte,et al.  Process‐based proxy of oxygen stress surpasses indirect ones in predicting vegetation characteristics , 2012 .

[2]  J. Svenning,et al.  Environmental and anthropogenic determinants of vegetation distribution across Africa , 2011 .

[3]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[4]  M. Angilletta,et al.  Can mechanism inform species' distribution models? , 2010, Ecology letters.

[5]  F. Fiorani,et al.  A method to construct dose-response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a meta-analysis of phenotypic data. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[6]  Peter M van Bodegom,et al.  Plant Strategies in Relation to Resource Supply in Mesic to Wet Environments: Does Theory Mirror Nature? , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Christopher N. Johnson,et al.  Separating the influences of environment and species interactions on patterns of distribution and abundance: competition between large herbivores. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  M. Kearney,et al.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[9]  P. Reich,et al.  A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility , 2009 .

[10]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[11]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California , 2009 .

[12]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Functional Traits and Niche-Based Tree Community Assembly in an Amazonian Forest , 2008, Science.

[13]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  Contemporary perspectives on the niche that can improve models of species range shifts under climate change , 2008, Biology Letters.

[14]  Jos C. van Dam,et al.  Critical soil conditions for oxygen stress to plant roots: Substituting the Feddes-function by a process-based model , 2008 .

[15]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[16]  Stephan Hennekens,et al.  Assignment of relevés to pre-defined classes by supervised clustering of plant communities using a new composite index , 2008 .

[17]  P. Torfs,et al.  Bayesian classification of vegetation types with Gaussian mixture density fitting to indicator values , 2007 .

[18]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[19]  S. Sugita,et al.  Theory of quantitative reconstruction of vegetation I: pollen from large sites REVEALS regional vegetation composition , 2007 .

[20]  M. Austin.  Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches , 2007 .

[21]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Assessing the relative importance of dispersal in plant communities using an ecoinformatics approach , 2005, Folia Geobotanica.

[22]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions , 2006 .

[23]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[24]  William G. Lee,et al.  Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate , 2005 .

[25]  M. Westoby,et al.  Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland, Australia , 2005 .

[26]  H. V. Dijk,et al.  Tussenrapport 2004: Harderbos , 2005 .

[27]  S. Schaaf,et al.  Eco-hydrology and biodiversity , 2005 .

[28]  J. Witte,et al.  Cover-weighted averaging of indicator values in vegetation analyses , 2004 .

[29]  T. Dawson,et al.  Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data , 2004 .

[30]  A. P. Schaffers.  Soil, biomass, and management of semi-natural vegetation – Part II. Factors controlling species diversity , 2002, Plant Ecology.

[31]  A. P. Schaffers.  Soil, biomass, and management of semi-natural vegetation – Part I. Interrelationships , 2002, Plant Ecology.

[32]  M. Wassen,et al.  Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands , 1998, Plant Ecology.

[33]  T. Webb,.  Is vegetation in equilibrium with climate? How to interpret late-Quaternary pollen data , 1986, Vegetatio.

[34]  M. Austin.  Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling , 2002 .

[35]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[36]  P. C. de Ruiter,et al.  N, P, AND K BUDGETS ALONG NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENTS IN WETLANDS , 2002 .

[37]  Ole R. Vetaas,et al.  Realized and potential climate niches: a comparison of four Rhododendron tree species , 2002 .

[38]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[39]  J. Schaminée,et al.  TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data , 2001 .

[40]  P. Reich,et al.  Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high‐ and low‐rainfall and high‐ and low‐nutrient habitats , 2001 .

[41]  R. Kemmers,et al.  Productiviteit van korte vegetaties en beperkende factoren in relatie tot voedselrijkdom en vochttoestand van natuurterreinen; basisonderzoek voor ecologische nutriëntenmodellen , 2001 .

[42]  H. F. Dobben,et al.  Relatie tussen vegetatie en abiotische factoren in het meetnet vitaliteit en verdroging; een statistische studie op grond van waarnemingen in 200 opstanden in 1995 en 1996 , 2001 .

[43]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[44]  R. Clárk,et al.  Mineral acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal plants , 2000 .

[45]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  Predictive mapping of alpine grasslands in Switzerland: Species versus community approach , 1999 .

[46]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns , 1999 .

[47]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Community Assembly Rules, Morphological Dispersion, and the Coexistence of Plant Species , 1998 .

[48]  J. Schaminee,et al.  De vegetatie van Nederland 3 , 1996 .

[49]  L. Ström,et al.  Differing organic Acid exudation pattern explains calcifuge and acidifuge behaviour of plants. , 1995, Annals of botany.

[50]  Martin T. Sykes,et al.  Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. , 1993 .

[51]  R. Leemans,et al.  Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic , 1992 .

[52]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[53]  W. Cramer,et al.  A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate , 1992 .

[54]  James A. Drake,et al.  Community-Assembly Mechanics and the Structure of an Experimental Species Ensemble , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[55]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[56]  J. Cowan,et al.  Some mathematical questions in biology , 1974 .

[57]  R. Levins.  The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[58]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .