Single integrin molecule adhesion forces in intact cells measured by atomic force microscopy.

Cross-talk between cells and the extracellular matrix is critically influenced by the mechanical properties of cell surface receptor-ligand interactions; these interactions are especially well defined and regulated in cells capable of dynamically modifying their matrix environment. In this study, attention was focused on osteoclasts, which are absolutely dependent on integrin extracellular matrix receptors in order to degrade bone; other bone cells, osteoblasts, were used for comparison. Integrin binding forces were measured in intact cells by atomic force microscopy (AFM) for several RGD-containing (Arg-Gly-Asp) ligands and ranged from 32 to 97 picoNewtons (pN); they were found to be cell and amino acid sequence specific, saturatable and sensitive to the pH and divalent cation composition of the cellular culture medium. In contrast to short linear RGD hexapeptides, larger peptides and proteins containing the RGD sequence, such as osteopontin (a major non-collagenous bone protein) and echistatin (a high affinity RGD sequence containing antagonist snake venom protein), showed different binding affinities. This demonstrates that the context of the RGD sequence within a protein has considerable influence upon the final binding force for receptor interaction. These data also demonstrate that AFM, as a methodological approach, can be adapted to cell biology studies wherever cell-matrix interactions play a critical role, and, moreover, may have applicability to the analysis of receptor-ligand interactions in cell membranes in general.

[1]  S. Dedhar,et al.  Integrin expression in human bone , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  D. Anselmetti,et al.  Binding strength between cell adhesion proteoglycans measured by atomic force microscopy , 1995, Science.

[3]  V. Garsky,et al.  Echistatin is a potent inhibitor of bone resorption in culture , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[5]  N. Hogg,et al.  Integrins take partners: cross-talk between integrins and other membrane receptors. , 1998, Trends in cell biology.

[6]  Christoph F. Schmidt,et al.  Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry , 1993, Nature.

[7]  Richard O. Hynes,et al.  Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion , 1992, Cell.

[8]  P. Lehenkari,et al.  Removal of osteoclast bone resorption products by transcytosis. , 1997, Science.

[9]  M. Raida,et al.  Structural and functional characterization of vitronectin-derived RGD-containing peptides from human hemofiltrate. , 1996, European journal of biochemistry.

[10]  C. Morris,et al.  Relative topography of biologically active domains of human vitronectin. Evidence from monoclonal antibody epitope and denaturation studies. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  M. Horton,et al.  Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides and the anti-vitronectin receptor antibody 23C6 inhibit dentine resorption and cell spreading by osteoclasts. , 1991, Experimental cell research.

[12]  K. Chan,et al.  Cyclic RGD peptide analogues as antiplatelet antithrombotics. , 1992, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  M. Horton,et al.  Interaction of Osteopontin with Osteoclast Integrins a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  E. Ruoslahti,et al.  Regulation of the fibronectin receptor affinity by divalent cations. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  M C Davies,et al.  Detection of antigen-antibody binding events with the atomic force microscope. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[16]  H. Gaub,et al.  Adhesion forces between individual ligand-receptor pairs. , 1994, Science.

[17]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  An Allosteric Ca2+ Binding Site on the β3-Integrins That Regulates the Dissociation Rate for RGD Ligands* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  M. Pfaff,et al.  Integrin affinity modulation. , 1998, Trends in cell biology.

[19]  M. Horton,et al.  Vitronectin receptor has a role in bone resorption but does not mediate tight sealing zone attachment of osteoclasts to the bone surface , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  S. Smith,et al.  Direct mechanical measurements of the elasticity of single DNA molecules by using magnetic beads. , 1992, Science.

[21]  M. Horton Adhesion Receptors as Therapeutic Targets , 1995 .

[22]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[23]  A Leung,et al.  Detachment of agglutinin-bonded red blood cells. II. Mechanical energies to separate large contact areas. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[24]  S. Nesbitt,et al.  Integrins on rat osteoclasts: Characterization of two monoclonal antibodies (F4 and F11) to rat β3 , 1992 .

[25]  Z. Werb,et al.  Journey Across the Osteoclast , 1997, Science.

[26]  M. Hegner,et al.  Specific antigen/antibody interactions measured by force microscopy. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[27]  V. Quaranta,et al.  Activation of alphav beta3 integrin on human osteoclast-like cells stimulates adhesion and migration in response to osteopontin. , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[28]  D'arcy W. Thompson On Growth and Form , 1945 .

[29]  D E Leckband,et al.  Long-range attraction and molecular rearrangements in receptor-ligand interactions. , 1992, Science.

[30]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Ca2+Suppresses Cell Adhesion to Osteopontin by Attenuating Binding Affinity for Integrin αvβ3* , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  M. Horton,et al.  Modulation of vitronectin receptor‐mediated osteoclast adhesion by Arg‐Gly‐Asp peptide analogs: A structure‐function analysis , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[32]  S. Schaus,et al.  Cell viability and probe-cell membrane interactions of XR1 glial cells imaged by atomic force microscopy. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[33]  David A. Kidwell,et al.  Sensing Discrete Streptavidin-Biotin Interactions with Atomic Force Microscopy , 1994 .

[34]  M. Horton,et al.  Trafficking of matrix collagens through bone-resorbing osteoclasts. , 1997, Science.

[35]  V. Saudek,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of echistatin, the smallest active RGD protein. , 1991, Biochemistry.