CUTANEOUS HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS TO CELLULAR ISOANTIGENS IN RATS

Rats have been shown to be capable of displaying the various kinds of delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions attributable to transplantation immunity previously described in guinea pigs, hamsters, rabbits, dogs, and man. The rat is unlike most other species in that much larger numbers of lymphoid cells are needed to incite these cutaneous reactions. With direct, transfer, or normal lymphocyte transfer reactions, the cutaneous responses were greater when donor and recipient differed at the Ag-B histocompatibility locus than when donor and recipient shared the same Ag-B alleles. An experiment was performed in which adult rats of a genetically defined backcross population, resulting from matings between DA and (DA x Lewis) F1 hybrid rats, were inoculated intradermally with lymph node cells from DA rats sensitized against tissues from Lewis-strain donors. Some of the R2 animals gave a biphasic transfer reaction with peak reactivities occurring first at 48 hr and recurring at 96–120 hr, while the others lacked this second component. Hemagglutination tests revealed that the R2 rats giving the biphasic response possessed the Ag-B,1 antigen, which is also present in Lewis rats, whereas rats which gave monophasic reactions were homozygous for the Ag-B,4 antigenic determinant which is present in the DA strain. This suggested that the recall flare at 96–120 hr reflects proliferative activity on the part of the inoculated cells confronted by the disparate Ag-B isoantigen in the host's dermis. Skin homografts from R1 animals bearing the Ag-B,1 antigen were uniformly rejected by DA hosts in 11 days or less, while grafts from backcross animals homozygous for the Ag-B,4 antigen usually lived longer, being rejected in 9 to 27 days. Evidence is also presented which suggests that specific isoantibodies may act synergistically with immune lymphocytes to bring about cutaneous inflammatory reactions in the rat.

[1]  H. Ramseier,et al.  Further studies of histocompatibility loci in rats. , 1967, Transplantation.

[2]  Streilein Jw,et al.  Transplantation Immunity and Delayed Cutaneous Hypersensitivity Reactions in Dogs , 1967 .

[3]  C. Barker,et al.  Transplantation immunity and delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in dogs. , 1967, Journal of immunology.

[4]  W. Silvers,et al.  Mixed Leukocyte Reactions and Histocompatibility in Rats , 1967, Science.

[5]  A. Monaco Transplantation of tissues and organs. , 1965, Journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  J. Palm,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF A SINGLE STRONG HISTOCOMPATIBILITY LOCUS IN THE RAT BY NORMAL SPLEEN‐CELL TRANSFER * , 1966 .

[7]  P. Medawar,et al.  Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity VIII. The effects of irradiation , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  J. Streilein,et al.  The irradiated hamster test. A new method of donor selection for homotransplantation in man. , 1966, Annals of internal medicine.

[9]  R. Billingham,et al.  STUDIES ON DELAYED CUTANEOUS INFLAMMATORY REACTIONS ELICITED BY INOCULATION OF HOMOLOGOUS CELLS INTO HAMSTERS' SKINS , 1966, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  W. Silvers,et al.  Failure to transfer Sensitivity to Skin Homografts by Means of ‘Immune’ Lymphoid Cells in Diffusion Chambers , 1966, Nature.

[11]  J. Streilein,et al.  HOMOGRAFT SENSITIVITY REACTIONS IN IRRADIATED HAMSTERS. , 1965, Lancet.

[12]  J. Palm SEROLOGICAL DETECTION OF HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS IN TWO STRAINS OF RATS , 1964, Transplantation.

[13]  D. Willoughby,et al.  THE LYMPH NODE PERMEABILITY FACTOR: A POSSIBLE MEDIATOR OF THE DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTION , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  P. Medawar,et al.  Tissue transplantation: a new approach to the “typing” problem. Brit , 1964 .

[15]  P. Medawar,et al.  Tissue Transplantation: A New Approach to the “Typing” Problem , 1963, British medical journal.

[16]  H. Dvorak,et al.  The "transfer reaction" in the rabbit. II. A radioautographic study. , 1963, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[17]  W. Silvers,et al.  SENSITIVITY TO HOMOGRAFTS OF NORMAL TISSUES AND CELLS. , 1963, Annual review of microbiology.

[18]  B. Waksman,et al.  Delayed cutaneous reactions in the rat. , 1962, Journal of immunology.

[19]  D. Steinmuller PASSIVE TRANSFER OF IMMUNITY TO SKIN HOMOGRAFTS IN RATS * , 1962, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  P. Medawar,et al.  Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity - VI. Hypersensitivity reactions associated with the rejection of homografts , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  J. Najarian,et al.  Passive transfer of transplantation immunity. I. Tritiated lymphoid cells. II. Lymphoid cells in millipore chambers. , 1962 .

[22]  W. Silvers,et al.  Adoptive transfer of transplantation immunity by means of blood-borne cells. , 1962, Lancet.

[23]  J. H. Elliott The Transplantation of Tissues and Organs , 1961 .

[24]  R. Wilson,et al.  The production of "delayed type" cutaneous hypersensitivity to human donor leukocytes as a result of the rejection of skin homografts. , 1961, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[25]  A. Bogdén,et al.  Immunogenetic Studies of a Histocompatibility Hemagglutinogen (R-1) in the Rat , 1961 .

[26]  W. Silvers,et al.  Transplantation of tissues and cells , 1961 .

[27]  J. R. Batchelor,et al.  SYNERGIC ACTION BETWEEN ISOANTIBODY AND IMMUNE CELLS IN GRAFT REJECTION , 1960, Transplantation bulletin.