Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol

[1]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Elie A Akl,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  E. Blozik,et al.  Telemedicine can help to ensure that patients receive timely medical care , 2012, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  Alison Bowes,et al.  Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  J. Humphreys,et al.  The index of rural access: an innovative integrated approach for measuring primary care access , 2009, BMC health services research.

[6]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Michael G. Kienzle,et al.  Tele-Education in a Telemedicine Environment: Implications for Rural Health Care and Academic Medical Centers , 1999, Journal of Medical Systems.

[10]  J P Vandenbroucke,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1998 .

[11]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[12]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2013 .

[13]  M. Innes.  Telephone consultations. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.