EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH TESTBED FOR INTERNET OF THINGS: A SURVEY FROM SECURITY SERVICES PERSPECTIVES

IoT testbed has been continuously on the rise in line with the significant advances of technology in sensor network to provide real-world interconnection. Researchers have developed numerous testbeds for IoT applications with many unique innovations. However, there is still a missing element in the testbed analysis on the security services and its methodologies that can lead to secure IoT application systems. This paper provides a framework to evolving IoT testbeds from the security services perspective, methodology and competency in IoT security which supports and enable multidisciplinary experimentation. Through a comprehensive literature survey of existing IoT testbeds, a set of core security design requirement for IoT security testbed is identified by examining vulnerabilities and attacks at every layer of architecture to get a deep understanding of the security assessment and best practices to conduct IoT security services.

[1]  Evangelos Theodoridis,et al.  SmartSantander: IoT experimentation over a smart city testbed , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[2]  Won-Kee Hong,et al.  Experimental Research Testbeds for Large-Scale WSNs: A Survey from the Architectural Perspective , 2015, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[3]  O. Saeed,et al.  Towards Internet of Things: Survey and Future Vision , 2013 .

[4]  Alexander Gluhak,et al.  SmartCampus: A user-centric testbed for Internet of Things experimentation , 2013, 2013 16th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC).

[5]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Risk-based adaptive security for smart IoT in eHealth , 2012, BODYNETS.

[6]  Shyam Nandan Kumar,et al.  Review on Network Security and Cryptography , 2015 .

[7]  Rolf H. Weber,et al.  Internet of Things - New security and privacy challenges , 2010, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[8]  Rizwan Khan,et al.  Review on Network Security and Cryptography , 2018 .

[9]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Security of IoT systems: Design challenges and opportunities , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD).

[10]  Lida Xu,et al.  The internet of things: a survey , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[11]  Ping Li,et al.  Trust mechanisms in wireless sensor networks: Attack analysis and countermeasures , 2012, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[12]  Thomas C. Schmidt,et al.  RIOT OS: Towards an OS for the Internet of Things , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[13]  Utz Roedig,et al.  Secure communication for the Internet of Things - a comparison of link-layer security and IPsec for 6LoWPAN , 2014, Secur. Commun. Networks.

[14]  Michael Demblewski,et al.  Security Frameworks for Machine-to-Machine Devices and Networks , 2015 .

[15]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[16]  Alexander Gluhak,et al.  A survey on facilities for experimental internet of things research , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Ramjee Prasad,et al.  Proposed embedded security framework for Internet of Things (IoT) , 2011, 2011 2nd International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology (Wireless VITAE).

[18]  Sotiris E. Nikoletseas,et al.  IoT Lab: Towards co-design and IoT solution testing using the crowd , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Recent Advances in Internet of Things (RIoT).

[19]  Farah Hussein Mohammed,et al.  Survey on IoT Services : Classifications and Applications , 2015 .

[20]  Sayan Kumar Ray,et al.  Challenges to development of multipurpose global federated testbed for Future Internet experimentation , 2011, 2011 9th IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA).