COMPOSING TRADEOFF MODELS FOR MULTI-ATTRIBUTE SYSTEM-LEVEL DECISION MAKING

In this paper, we study the prospects for modeling a system by composing tradeoff models of its components. A tradeoff model is an abstract representation of a system in terms of a predictive relationship between its top-level attributes. Designers can use this to predict the attributes they would achieve if they implemented the system. Prior approaches to generating tradeoff information are incompatible with model composition due to their reliance on classical Pareto dominance. We show that by using a generalization of this, called parameterized Pareto dominance, designers can produce tradeoff models that they can compose validly. The focus of this paper is on analyzing the modeling approach mathematically. The main result is proof that, under mild assumptions about how component-level attributes relate to system-level attributes, the approach is mathematically sound from a decision-theoretic perspective. The paper also includes a demonstration of the approach on the design of a hydraulic log splitter system using hydraulic component tradeoff models based on data about commercially-available components.

[1]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Pareto Frontier Based Concept Selection Under Uncertainty, with Visualization , 2005 .

[2]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative Optimization: Status and Directions , 2000 .

[3]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[4]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Simulation-based optimal design of heavy trucks by model-based decomposition: an extensive analytical target cascading case study , 2004 .

[5]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  ESTIMATING THE TECHNOLOGY FRONTIER FOR PERSONAL ELECTRIC VEHICLES , 2005 .

[6]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Decision And Value Theory , 1965 .

[7]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[8]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Introduction to systems engineering , 2000 .

[9]  A. Messac,et al.  Normal Constraint Method with Guarantee of Even Representation of Complete Pareto Frontier , 2004 .

[10]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[11]  T. Saaty.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[12]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Pitfalls of the Typical Construction of Decision Matrices for Concept Selection , 2003 .

[13]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[14]  G.M. Stump,et al.  Visual Steering and Trade Space Exploration , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[15]  Xiaoyu Gu,et al.  Decision-Based Collaborative Optimization , 2002 .

[16]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Design Space Visualization and Its Application to a Design by Shopping Paradigm , 2003, DAC 2003.

[17]  Eliot Winer,et al.  Development of visual design steering as an aid in large-scale multidisciplinary design optimization. Part I: method development , 2002 .

[18]  Ashwin P. Gurnani,et al.  A constraint-based approach to feasibility assessment in preliminary design , 2006, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[19]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox , 2002 .

[20]  Isao Ono,et al.  Uniform sampling of local pareto-optimal solution curves by pareto path following and its applications in multi-objective GA , 2007, GECCO '07.

[21]  Donald G. Saari,et al.  Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes , 2000 .

[22]  W. Hryniuk.  More is better. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  A spiral model of software development and enhancement , 1986, Computer.

[24]  A. Messac,et al.  Concept Selection Using s-Pareto Frontiers , 2003 .

[25]  Alexander V. Lotov,et al.  Hybrid adaptive methods for approximating a nonconvex multidimensional Pareto frontier , 2006 .

[26]  Scott Ferguson,et al.  A study of convergence and mapping in preliminary vehicle design , 2005 .

[27]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Target Cascading in Optimal System Design , 2003, DAC 2000.

[28]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Modeling Design Concepts under Risk and Uncertainty using Parameterized Efficient Sets , 2008 .

[29]  Kevin Forsberg,et al.  The Relationship of Systems Engineering to the Project Cycle , 1992 .

[30]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  Validation of engineering design alternative selection methods , 2003 .

[31]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[32]  Thomas T Samaras,et al.  Less is better. , 2002, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[33]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[34]  Eliot Winer,et al.  Visual design steering for optimization solution improvement , 2001 .

[35]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Convergence properties of analytical target cascading , 2002 .

[36]  Dennis M. Buede,et al.  The Engineering Design of Systems , 2009 .

[37]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Using Parameterized Pareto Sets to Model Design Concepts , 2007 .

[38]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Comparative properties of collaborative optimization and other approaches to MDO , 1999 .

[39]  Alexander V. Lotov,et al.  Experience of model integration and Pareto frontier visualization in the search for preferable water quality strategies , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[40]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques , 2000 .