An International Needs Assessment Survey of Guideline Developers Demonstrates Variability in Resources and Challenges to Collaboration between Organizations

[1]  E. Akl,et al.  The reporting checklist for public versions of guidelines: RIGHT-PVG , 2021, Implementation Science.

[2]  Megan N. Humphries,et al.  The quality of physical activity guidelines, but not the specificity of their recommendations, has improved over time: A systematic review and critical appraisal. , 2020, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[3]  Anna Noel-Storr,et al.  Citation screening using crowdsourcing and machine learning produced accurate results: evaluation of Cochrane's modified Screen4Me service. , 2020, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Anna Selva,et al.  The UpPriority Tool was developed to guide the prioritization of clinical guideline questions for updating. , 2020, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  P. Dahm,et al.  Guideline developers in the United States were inconsistent in applying criteria for appropriate Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation use , 2020 .

[6]  H. Schünemann,et al.  A Theoretical Framework and Competency-Based Approach to Training in Guideline Development , 2019, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  Holger J. Schünemann,et al.  Development of rapid guidelines: 3. GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for rapid recommendations , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[8]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  P. Tugwell,et al.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[10]  M. Trujillo-martín,et al.  Continuous surveillance of a pregnancy clinical guideline: an early experience , 2017, Systematic Reviews.

[11]  F. Song,et al.  A Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT Statement. , 2017, Annals of internal medicine.

[12]  Wolfgang Greiner,et al.  Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation—A Scoping Review , 2016, Healthcare.

[13]  Romina Brignardello-Petersen,et al.  Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[14]  Thomas Agoritsas,et al.  How to use a subgroup analysis: users' guide to the medical literature. , 2014, JAMA.

[15]  V. Montori,et al.  Endocrine clinical practice guidelines in North America. A systematic assessment of quality. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  J. M. Carrasco,et al.  The updating of clinical practice guidelines: insights from an international survey , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[17]  Michelle E. Kho,et al.  AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[18]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[19]  H. Schünemann,et al.  A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD , 2009, The Lancet.

[20]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Kavita Gupta,et al.  A Practical Guide to Needs Assessment , 1998 .

[22]  Elie A Akl,et al.  [A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement]. , 2017, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[23]  M. Tirani,et al.  [Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise]. , 2015, Recenti progressi in medicina.

[24]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[25]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  Darlene Russ-Eft,et al.  A practical guide to needs assessment, 2nd ed. , 2007 .