Robust Airline Crew Pairing: Move-up Crews

Due to irregular operations, the crew cost at the end of a month is typically substantially higher than the crew cost projected in planning. We assume that the fleeting and the aircraft routing decisions have already been made. We present a model and a solution methodology that produces robust crew schedules in planning. Besides the objective of minimizing the crew cost, we introduce the objective of maximizing the number of move-up crews, i.e., the crews that can potentially be swapped in operations. To solve the resulting large-scale integer program, we use a combination of delayed column generation and Lagrangian relaxation. The restricted master problem is solved by means of Lagrangian relaxation and the “duals” of the restricted master problem, which are used in delayed column generation, and correspond to the Lagrangian multipliers. We report computational experiments that demonstrate the benefits of using the robust crew schedule instead of the traditional one. We evaluate various crew schedules by generating random disruptions and then running a crew recovery module. We compare solutions with respect to the direct crew cost and indirect costs such as uncovered legs, reserved crews, and deadheading. The main conclusion is that robustness leads to reduced operational crew cost; however, in planning the trade-off between the inflated direct crew cost and robustness needs to be exploited judicially.

[1]  C. Lemaréchal Chapter VII Nondifferentiable optimization , 1989 .

[2]  Martin Desrochers,et al.  A Breakthrough in Airline Crew Scheduling , 1991 .

[3]  Jacques Desrosiers,et al.  Time Constrained Routing and Scheduling , 1992 .

[4]  Jacques Desrosiers,et al.  Crew Pairing at Air France , 1993 .

[5]  Jacques Desrosiers,et al.  The Operational Airline Crew Scheduling Problem , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[6]  Jacques Desrosiers,et al.  A Unified Framework for Deterministic Time Constrained Vehicle Routing and Crew Scheduling Problems , 1998 .

[7]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Approaches to incorporating robustness into airline scheduling , 2000 .

[8]  George L. Nemhauser,et al.  A Stochastic Model of Airline Operations , 2002, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Michelle J. Karow Virtual hubs : an airline schedule recovery concept and model , 2003 .

[10]  Diego Klabjan,et al.  Airline Crew Scheduling , 2003 .

[11]  J. Donoghue RECOVERY 2004: GAINING STRENGTH , 2004 .

[12]  George L. Nemhauser,et al.  A Robust Fleet-Assignment Model with Hub Isolation and Short Cycles , 2004, Transp. Sci..

[13]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  A Scenario Aggregation - Based Approach for Determining a Robust Airline Fleet Composition for Dynamic Capacity Allocation , 2002, Transp. Sci..

[15]  George L. Nemhauser,et al.  Airline Crew Scheduling Under Uncertainty , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[16]  John R. Birge,et al.  A Stochastic Programming Approach to the Airline Crew Scheduling Problem , 2006, Transp. Sci..