Prediction of the mechanical response of the femur with uncertain elastic properties.

A mandatory requirement for any reliable prediction of the mechanical response of bones, based on quantitative computer tomography, is an accurate relationship between material properties (usually Young's modulus E) and bone density ρ. Many such E-ρ relationships are available based on different experiments on femur specimens with a large spread due to uncertainties. The first goal of this study is to pool and analyze the relevant available experimental data and develop a stochasticE-ρ relationship. This analysis highlights that there is no experimental data available to cover the entire density range of the human femur and that some "popular" E-ρ relationships are based on data that contains extreme scatter, while others are based on a very limited amount of information. The second goal is to use the newly developed stochastic E-ρ relationship in high-order finite element analyses (FEAs) for the computation of strains and displacements in two human proximal femurs, mimicking in vitro experiments. When compared with the experimental observations, the FEA predictions using the median of the stochastic E-ρ relationship follow the underlying distribution of the stochastic E-ρ relationship. Thus, most deviations of the FEA predictions from experimental observations can possibly be explained by uncertain elastic properties of the femur.

[1]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Paul J Rullkoetter,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty in mechanical properties for finite element-based evaluation of bone mechanics. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Uday V. Pise,et al.  A B-spline based heterogeneous modeling and analysis of proximal femur with graded element. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Z. Yosibash,et al.  Patient-specific Finite-element Analyses of the Proximal Femur with Orthotropic Material Properties Validated , 2022 .

[6]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[7]  A. DeMaris Introduction to Regression Modeling , 2005 .

[8]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals , 2005 .

[9]  M. Viceconti,et al.  A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  Roger Koenker,et al.  A note on studentizing a test for heteroscedasticity , 1981 .

[11]  D. Davy,et al.  The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  L. Joskowicz,et al.  A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  J H Keyak,et al.  Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[15]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  P J Laz,et al.  A review of probabilistic analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[18]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Stochastic simulation of riser-sections with uncertain measured pressure loads and/or uncertain material properties , 2007 .

[19]  Barbara Reggiani,et al.  Finite-Element Modeling of Bones From CT Data: Sensitivity to Geometry and Material Uncertainties , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: a statistical analysis. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  R. Geary,et al.  Testing for Normality , 2003 .

[22]  W C Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  C. Milgrom,et al.  Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  T. Keller Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Validation of subject-specific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  M. Browne,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of an uncemented total hip replacement. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[33]  P. Zysset,et al.  Elastic anisotropy of human cortical bone secondary osteons measured by nanoindentation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  H. Skinner,et al.  Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.